Does an externally bought IP need re-verification?
May 9, 2014
Verification is never ending process! You can never be sure that you have verified everything. The aim of verification is risk reduction to the level of practical perfection.
The increase in chip complexity coupled with pressure to shorten time to market, are pushing chip design companies towards adoption of third party IPs. Let us consider you have weighed in all pros and cons of IP outsourcing and decided have to go for a third party IP for your next project. Then the question is - Does the externally bought IP need re-verification?
Let us answer this question by first examining the reasons that third party vendors may give you to persuade you not to go for re-verification:
Related Semiconductor IP
- Band-Gap Voltage Reference with dual 2µA Current Source - X-FAB XT018
- 250nA-88μA Current Reference - X-FAB XT018-0.18μm BCD-on-SOI CMOS
- UCIe D2D Adapter & PHY Integrated IP
- Low Dropout (LDO) Regulator
- 16-Bit xSPI PSRAM PHY
Related Blogs
- ARM Cortex-A15 - does this processor IP core need a new category ... Superstar IP?
- How many people does it take to design an SoC? - Redux. Building brains with processors.
- Does your VIP need a GUI?
- Find Everything You Need to Build an Advanced PCI Express 4.0 Solution in One Booth - Visit Cadence at PCI-SIG DevCon 2015
Latest Blogs
- AI in Design Verification: Where It Works and Where It Doesn’t
- PCIe 7.0 fundamentals: Baseline ordering rules
- Ensuring reliability in Advanced IC design
- A Closer Look at proteanTecs Health and Performance Management Solutions Portfolio
- Enabling Memory Choice for Modern AI Systems: Tenstorrent and Rambus Deliver Flexible, Power-Efficient Solutions