What is cloud-based security lifecycle management for connected objects and why is it important?
Connected device architecture is no longer an evolving concept. With the maturation of this methodology in today’s Internet of Things (IoT), new challenges are uncovered as the market compels vendors to innovate in the amount of services provided at the edge. Vendors and OEMs, in turn, are making end-user services more sophisticated, increasing the security spectrum of this framework. The need to update the firmware/software stems from the obsolescence of device security measures and improved services, and additionally are regulatory requirements, such as in the standards EN 303645 (Europe) and NIST SP 800-193 (USA). To mitigate the growing threats and vulnerabilities in the field and protect end-user devices from cyberattacks at both the network and device levels, a new strategy is needed to filter attacks in real time and implement a centralized protection mechanism for all connected modules.
Secure-IC addresses this problematic with its new SecuryzrTM iSSP, a unique Cybersecurity lifecycle management platform for connected objects.
To read the full article, click here
Related Semiconductor IP
- TSMC 7nm 0V75 / 0V9 ESD Local Clamp – Low Cap
- TSMC 65nm 3V3 ESD Local Clamp – Rad Hard
- TSMC 5nm 1V8, 1.2V and 0.9V ESD Local Protection – Low Cap
- TSMC 3nm 3V3 ESD Local Clamp
- TSMC 3nm 1V2 ESD Local Clamp – Low Capacitance
Related Blogs
- Post-quantum security in platform management: PQShield is ready for SPDM 1.4
- QuiddiKey: A Single Cryptographic Solution for the Lifecycle of a Connected Device
- How Silicon Lifecycle Management Strengthens HPC and Data Center Reliability
- The Growing Importance of PVT Monitoring for Silicon Lifecycle Management
Latest Blogs
- Beyond Trusted: What the NSA’s New Guidance Means for Hardware Security
- A scalable, shader-programmable vector graphics GPU core for low-power MCUs
- Navigating ISO 26262 Part 11: A Guide for Semiconductor Architects
- Embedded Security explained: Digital signatures
- Hardware security verification must go beyond functional testing