What’s the number of ASIC versus FPGA design starts?
Clive Maxfield, EETimes
3/20/2011 12:32 PM EDT
It is not uncommon to see an article or read a paper that says something like “In 2010 there were 2,500 ASIC design starts versus 90,000 FPGA design starts.” And we say to ourselves: “Well, that’s jolly interesting.” And then we quote these values to each other in conversations at the water cooler and use them in our own papers and articles, but where do these numbers actually come from and how accurate are they?
Of course we all know that there are fewer ASIC design starts today as compared to say five or ten years ago. This is primarily because designing ASICs at the latest and greatest technology nodes is an increasingly complex, resource-intensive, time-consuming, and expensive hobby.
It’s also common knowledge that there are more FPGA design starts today than there were five and ten years ago. In addition to the fact that the use of electronics is increasing dramatically in almost all walks of life, this is primarily due to the fact that today’s FPGAs have higher capacity and higher performance coupled with lower power consumption (relatively speaking), all of which means that FPGAs can now play in applications and markets that were previously “owned” by ASICs and other devices.
To read the full article, click here
Related Semiconductor IP
- TSMC 7nm 0V75 / 0V9 ESD Local Clamp – Low Cap
- TSMC 65nm 3V3 ESD Local Clamp – Rad Hard
- TSMC 5nm 1V8, 1.2V and 0.9V ESD Local Protection – Low Cap
- TSMC 3nm 3V3 ESD Local Clamp
- TSMC 3nm 1V2 ESD Local Clamp – Low Capacitance
Related Articles
- The pitfalls of mixing formal and simulation: Where trouble starts
- What's Really Behind the Adoption of eFPGA?
- An Outline of the Semiconductor Chip Design Flow
- The rise of FPGA technology in High-Performance Computing
Latest Articles
- LACE: Large Language Model Aided Multi-Agent Framework for Agile RISC-V Instruction Extension
- A Process-Aware Hybrid Si/IGO Monolithic-3D 6T SRAM with BEOL Pass-Gates for the 2nm Node
- Automated Estimation of MBIST Area and Test Time in Heterogeneous Memory IPs via Stacked Ensemble Framework
- VIPER: Architecture-Aware Performance Modeling for Processing-in-Memory Design-Space Exploration
- CTTE: An Open Dual-Protocol RISC-V Trace Encoder for N-Trace and E-Trace