DSP or FPGA? How to choose the right device
May 07, 2008 -- dspdesignline.com
DSPs and FPGAs both offer advantages for signal processing. Here are the design guidelines you need to choose between DSPs, FPGAs, or a combination of the two. Topics covered include device cost, performance, NRE, and availability of application-specific features.
System
designers face a number of key questions during the architecture phase of their project. Increasingly one of these questions is whether to use an FPGA (field programmable gate array) or a DSP (digital signal processor). To answer this question, system designers consider parameters such as:
- System performance requirements for signal processing
- Power consumption
- Component count and form factor
- Future product/system road-map and upgradeability for the system
- Economic parameters such as non-recurring engineering (NRE) investment, bill-of-materials (BOM) cost, time-to-market and project risk
The decision also depends on the technology familiarity factor. In some cases, the design team is well-versed in DSP systems but has little FPGA background, or vice-versa. In such cases, the team skill-set may drive the choice between FPGA and DSP. For example, Nuvation recently worked on an algorithm acceleration project where the algorithm lent itself to wide parallel implementation in an FPGA. However, classic FPGA approaches were ruled out due to the lack of FPGA skills in the client's engineering team and the potential barriers this presented to product lifecycle maintenance.
We acknowledge that most engineers and system architects are more familiar with DSP technology due to the simplicity of designing with DSPs. This is a clear advantage for DSPs. However, developer familiarity varies widely across design teams, so it is difficult say how important this issue is to a "generic" design team. Thus, this article ignores this DSP advantage and assumes that the choice of technology does not depend on developer familiarity.
In order to choose between FPGA and DSP, we look at system performance requirements for signal processing and BOM cost. We consider devices from a major DSP vendor (Texas Instruments) and a major FPGA vendor (Altera) to guide us through this process. We identify some of the signal processing applications in which each specific technology is clearly superior. We also consider where an FPGA may be used as a co-processor to a DSP chip.
To read the full article, click here
Related Semiconductor IP
- AXI to UCIe FDI Interface IP
- 45SPCLO UCIe-Class 1-32Gbps Low Power Receiver IP (NRZ)
- 45SPCLO UCIe-Class 1-32Gbps Low Power Transmitter IP (NRZ)
- Peripheral Sensor Interface (PSI5) Host Controller
- Link Acceleration Unit
Related Articles
- High-Performance DSPs -> Software-defined radio infrastructure taps DSP
- High-Performance DSPs -> DSP performance: Useful work per clock tick
- High-Performance DSPs -> Reconfigurable coprocessors create flexibility in DSP apps
- Market Focus: DSP makers' forward spin on the market
Latest Articles
- CHIA: An open-source framework for principled, agentic AI-driven hardware/software co-design research
- Croc: Training the Next Generation Chip Designers on Domain-Specific End-to-End Open Source Silicon
- Design and Development of a Neuromorphic Silicon Suite: PVT Sensing, Stochastic LIF Inference, On-Chip STDP Learning, and Crossbar Programming
- LLM4RTL: Tool-Assisted LLM for RTL Generation
- Towards Delta Aware Training: Efficient DNN Weight Storage for Resource-Constrained FPGAs