Design considerations for integrated CMOS receivers
By Louis Fan Fei, Garmin International
RF Designline -- (10/12/07, 08:13:00 AM EDT)
To meet the demands for the multi-band, multi-mode wireless standards in the current market, a highly integrated wireless receiver (RX) is desired. CMOS technology has become the technology of choice for the integrated receiver design. CMOS's raw performance is not as good as SiGe or GaAs. But most of the baseband (BB) ICs are implemented with CMOS. Thus, it gives the advantage to CMOS in applications where a single chip that combines RF and BB IC is desired. The cost advantages of established CMOS manufacturing processes are also a factor to consider.
A traditional heterodyne RX converts the RF signal to the intermediate frequency (IF) stage. At every stage, various filters, such as surface acoustic wave (SAW) ones, are used to filter out the image signal, to select the channel, and to reduce the effects of any interfering signals. It is hard to achieve a fully-integrated receiver because of the required external components. Direct-conversion RX has become the dominant RX architecture. The well-known problems with a direct conversion RX like DC offset, high input second order intercept point (IIP2), and 1/f noise can be resolved with various correction loops in the BB and careful RFIC designs.
The major RX performance parameters are RX sensitivity, RX selectivity, dynamic range, IIP2, IIP3, and phase noise. The RX sensitivity is mostly set by the front end low noise amplifier (LNA) and the demodulator (DEMOD). The RX selectivity is determined by the on-chip low pass filter (LPF)'s rejection performance. Dynamic range, IIP2, and IIP3 are the measures of how robust a RX is with the presence of in-band and out-of-band interferences. Phase noise has a major impact on the signal modulation and demodulation as phase-shift key modulation is commonly used. This article thus will focus the major building blocks in the RX that influence receiver performance.
To read the full article, click here
Related Semiconductor IP
- DFI 6.0 Verification IP
- TSMC 7nm 0V75 / 0V9 ESD Local Clamp – Low Cap
- TSMC 65nm 3V3 ESD Local Clamp – Rad Hard
- TSMC 5nm 1V8, 1.2V and 0.9V ESD Local Protection – Low Cap
- TSMC 3nm 3V3 ESD Local Clamp
Related Articles
- Si-GT: Fast Interconnect Signal Integrity Analysis For Integrated Circuit Design Via Graph Transformers
- Generative AI for Analog Integrated Circuit Design: Methodologies and Applications
- Physical Design Exploration of a Wire-Friendly Domain-Specific Processor for Angstrom-Era Nodes
- PCIe 5.0: The universal high-speed interconnect for High Bandwidth and Low Latency Applications Design Challenges & Solutions
Latest Articles
- Scalable AXI4 Transaction Monitoring for Mixed-Criticality SoCs: From Phase-Level Precision to ID-Level Efficiency
- Hardware-managed heterogeneous high-bandwidth memory and flash in LLM inference systems
- LACE: Large Language Model Aided Multi-Agent Framework for Agile RISC-V Instruction Extension
- A Process-Aware Hybrid Si/IGO Monolithic-3D 6T SRAM with BEOL Pass-Gates for the 2nm Node
- Automated Estimation of MBIST Area and Test Time in Heterogeneous Memory IPs via Stacked Ensemble Framework