ARM Mali-T604 tips mobile graphics, computing, and IP trends
Ron Wilson, EETimes
7/5/2011 11:52 AM EDT
An examination of ARM’s Mali-T604 graphics processing core yields some important insights into the future of mobile devices, the changing nature of graphics computing, and the future of large IP cores. None of these is destined to rest in familiar territory.
The T604, according to ARM director of graphics research Tom Olson, is a radical departure from the architecture originally introduced by Falanx, the small Norwegian graphics company that would become the heart of ARM’s Media Processing Division. The original Mali family, culminating in the Mali-400MP, was a tile-based architecture conventionally divided into a geometry engine on the front end, responsible for determining the vertices of the polygons in the image; and a shading engine on the back end, responsible for coloring-in those polygons. The tile-based organization of the work is the same, but pretty much everything else has changed.
The impetus for change comes from users’ growing expectations for mobile graphics, according to ARM senior product manager Steve Steele. “In five years, we believe, users will have come to expect an immersive experience on their mobile devices, with gesture-based input and 1080-progressive-scan displays, showing well-rendered images with complex lighting,” Steele suggested. Olson agreed: “During this period the look and feel of desktop and of mobile graphics systems will be converging.”
The T604, according to ARM director of graphics research Tom Olson, is a radical departure from the architecture originally introduced by Falanx, the small Norwegian graphics company that would become the heart of ARM’s Media Processing Division. The original Mali family, culminating in the Mali-400MP, was a tile-based architecture conventionally divided into a geometry engine on the front end, responsible for determining the vertices of the polygons in the image; and a shading engine on the back end, responsible for coloring-in those polygons. The tile-based organization of the work is the same, but pretty much everything else has changed.
The impetus for change comes from users’ growing expectations for mobile graphics, according to ARM senior product manager Steve Steele. “In five years, we believe, users will have come to expect an immersive experience on their mobile devices, with gesture-based input and 1080-progressive-scan displays, showing well-rendered images with complex lighting,” Steele suggested. Olson agreed: “During this period the look and feel of desktop and of mobile graphics systems will be converging.”
To read the full article, click here
Related Semiconductor IP
- Simplified Integration USB PD Capable Type-C Sink IP
- eFPGA on GlobalFoundries GF12LPP
- MIPI C‑PHY/D‑PHY IP on TSMC N2P
- Clustered IP to Scale Throughput
- Higher‑Throughput NPU IP Core
Related Articles
- Mobile video: ARM vs. DSP vs. hardware
- Graphics processing: When DIY just doesn't make sense
- Using FPGAs in Mobile Heterogeneous Computing Architectures
- NVMe host IP for computing accelerator
Latest Articles
- Towards Delta Aware Training: Efficient DNN Weight Storage for Resource-Constrained FPGAs
- CHERI-D: Secure and efficient inline object ID for CHERI temporal memory safety
- AIA: A 16nm Multicore SoC for Approximate Inference Acceleration Exploiting Non-normalized Knuth-Yao Sampling and Inter-Core Register Sharing
- InjectV: Modeling Fault Injection Attacks in RISC-V Simulation Environment
- SPARX: Secure and Privacy-Aware Approximate CNN Acceleration with Edge RISC-V SoC