Opinion: The yin and yang of designing big chips
In thinking about this viewpoint, it occurred to me that a good place to start is with the EDA industry itself –– what characterizes it, for example? It strikes me that in EDA we are quite different as an industry compared to, say, the medical industry, especially in terms of speed of innovation. If a person in academia dreams up an EDA idea, it can be implemented, tested to ensure that it works, and put on the market reasonably quickly.
However, the proof needed to demonstrate that an EDA innovation works reliably is somewhat less rigorous than the testing and approvals process that medicine and medical technology needs to go through –– and with good reason. This is chiefly because the medical industry deals with people, which make the consequences of something going wrong far more serious.
To read the full article, click here
Related Semiconductor IP
- NPU IP
- JPEG XL Encoder
- I2C Master/Slave Controller Core
- NVMe Validation Test Suite
- Hybrid Memory Cube Verification IP
Related Articles
- Bigger Chips, More IPs, and Mounting Challenges in Addressing the Growing Complexity of SoC Design
- Designing low-power multiprocessor chips
- Advantages and Challenges of Designing with Multiple Inferencing Chips
- Rising respins and need for re-evaluation of chip design strategies
Latest Articles
- Terracotta: Enabling the Adoption of New DRAM Techniques via a Flexible DRAM Interface and Memory Controller
- A Framework for Accelerating Transformer Inference on RISC-V for Edge AI
- An Interleaved Parallel Dependent Quantization Hardware Architecture for H.266/VVC
- A Formal Security Analysis of CAN XL
- A Secure dToF LiDAR SoC with Dual-Domain Fingerprinting and Event-Driven AFE Circuit Achieving Sensor-Level Attack Resilience