Opinion: The yin and yang of designing big chips
In thinking about this viewpoint, it occurred to me that a good place to start is with the EDA industry itself –– what characterizes it, for example? It strikes me that in EDA we are quite different as an industry compared to, say, the medical industry, especially in terms of speed of innovation. If a person in academia dreams up an EDA idea, it can be implemented, tested to ensure that it works, and put on the market reasonably quickly.
However, the proof needed to demonstrate that an EDA innovation works reliably is somewhat less rigorous than the testing and approvals process that medicine and medical technology needs to go through –– and with good reason. This is chiefly because the medical industry deals with people, which make the consequences of something going wrong far more serious.
To read the full article, click here
Related Semiconductor IP
Related Articles
- Bigger Chips, More IPs, and Mounting Challenges in Addressing the Growing Complexity of SoC Design
- Understanding the Power Consumption of Modern High Bandwidth Memory: Experimental Analysis and Modeling Using Real HBM2 DRAM Chips
- Designing low-power multiprocessor chips
- Advantages and Challenges of Designing with Multiple Inferencing Chips
Latest Articles
- Automated Multi-Line Bug Repair Using Model Checker Aided LLMs: A Case Study on RISC-V Processors
- Cryogenic Recharacterization of a Commercial 22 nm FD-SOI Foundry Standard-Cell Library
- A 105 MS/s 4.18 nJ/inference 0.765 mm² Mixed-Signal Streaming ML Engine for Wireless Baseband in 12LP+ FinFET
- Agentic AI for Heterogeneous System Design Across Chip, Scale-Up, and Scale-Out Domains
- Minimum RISC-V: Maximum FPGA Efficiency