Tutorial: Improving the transient immunity of your microcontroller-based embedded design - Part 2
By Ross Carlton, Freescale Semiconductor, Inc.
Nov 17 2006 (9:15 AM), Embedded.com
The hardware design techniques employed for an application will establish the baseline immunity performance. The purpose of hardware techniques is to reduce the level or frequency content of immunity signals below that needed to cause performance degradation or long-term microcontroller (MCU) reliability problems.
Hardware techniques should be maximized to ensure desired electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) performance before attempting any software techniques. This is important because software techniques do not reduce the level of immunity signals to which the MCU is exposed " they only reduce the impact of these signals on system operation. Even though the application performance may not be degraded, exposure to immunity signals can adversely affect long-term reliability.
In order to produce an application that meets both the mandated EMC requirements and minimizes cost, the design process must be both methodical and iterative. Rigorous system and PCB design methodologies are required to ensure quality and consistency in the design process. Without such methodologies, achieving EMC compliance will be accidental and unrepeatable. The design process must also be iterative to ensure the best possible system design and PCB layout at the lowest cost.
A design that minimizes cost cannot be completed properly in one pass " regardless of the quality of personnel or tools. An EMC-compliant, low-cost application is the result of close and consistent collaboration between the EMC engineer and all other engineering disciplines (i.e. " electrical engineers, mechanical engineers, PCB layout engineers, etc).
Nov 17 2006 (9:15 AM), Embedded.com
The hardware design techniques employed for an application will establish the baseline immunity performance. The purpose of hardware techniques is to reduce the level or frequency content of immunity signals below that needed to cause performance degradation or long-term microcontroller (MCU) reliability problems.
Hardware techniques should be maximized to ensure desired electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) performance before attempting any software techniques. This is important because software techniques do not reduce the level of immunity signals to which the MCU is exposed " they only reduce the impact of these signals on system operation. Even though the application performance may not be degraded, exposure to immunity signals can adversely affect long-term reliability.
In order to produce an application that meets both the mandated EMC requirements and minimizes cost, the design process must be both methodical and iterative. Rigorous system and PCB design methodologies are required to ensure quality and consistency in the design process. Without such methodologies, achieving EMC compliance will be accidental and unrepeatable. The design process must also be iterative to ensure the best possible system design and PCB layout at the lowest cost.
A design that minimizes cost cannot be completed properly in one pass " regardless of the quality of personnel or tools. An EMC-compliant, low-cost application is the result of close and consistent collaboration between the EMC engineer and all other engineering disciplines (i.e. " electrical engineers, mechanical engineers, PCB layout engineers, etc).
To read the full article, click here
Related Semiconductor IP
- Stand-Alone ESD Cell in GF 28nm
- Analog I/O Library with a custom 12V ESD Solution IN GF 55nm
- ESD Solutions for Multi-Gigabit SerDes in TSMC 28nm
- High-Speed 3.3V I/O library with 8kV ESD Protection in TSPCo 65nm
- Full Radiation-Hardened ESD Library in GF 12nm LP/LP+
Related Articles
- Guide to VHDL for embedded software developers: Part 2 - More essential commands
- Improving ASIP code generation and back-end compilation: Part 2
- Designing with ARM Cortex-M based SoC Achitectures: Part 2 - Some typical applications
- Internal JTAG - A cutting-edge solution for embedded instrument testing in SoC: Part 2
Latest Articles
- Croc: Training the Next Generation Chip Designers on Domain-Specific End-to-End Open Source Silicon
- Design and Development of a Neuromorphic Silicon Suite: PVT Sensing, Stochastic LIF Inference, On-Chip STDP Learning, and Crossbar Programming
- LLM4RTL: Tool-Assisted LLM for RTL Generation
- Towards Delta Aware Training: Efficient DNN Weight Storage for Resource-Constrained FPGAs
- CHERI-D: Secure and efficient inline object ID for CHERI temporal memory safety