The pitfalls of mixing formal and simulation: Where trouble starts
By Mark Eslinger, Joe Hupcey and Nicolae Tusinschi (Siemens EDA)
EDN (May 23, 2022)
The most effective functional verification environments employ multiple analysis technologies, where the strengths of each are combined to reinforce each other to help ensure that the device under test (DUT) behaves as specified. However, this creates an inherent challenge of properly comparing—and combining—the results from each source to give a succinct, accurate picture of the verification effort’s true status.
The most common problem we see is when design engineers want to merge the results from formal analysis with the results of RTL code and functional coverage from their UVM testbench, yet they don’t fully understand what formal coverage is providing. Hence, we will start on the familiar ground of simulation-generated code and functional coverage before going into defining formal coverage.
To read the full article, click here
Related Semiconductor IP
- Zigbee Transceiver PHY
- Data Flow Architecture IP
- AMBA SPI Controller MRAM Controller
- Ethernet MAC
- Protocol Bridges
Related Articles
- The Rise of RISC-V and ISO 26262 Compliance
- The Growing Importance of AI Inference and the Implications for Memory Technology
- The Growing Imperative Of Hardware Security Assurance In IP And SoC Design
- Bigger Chips, More IPs, and Mounting Challenges in Addressing the Growing Complexity of SoC Design
Latest Articles
- A Low-Latency ASIC Architecture for Real-Time Line Segment Detection
- BitFair: A 12nm Bit-Serial CNN Accelerator with Learnable Early Termination and Adaptive Bit Ordering for Ultra-Low-Power XR Vision
- A Flexible Sparsity-Aware FPGA Accelerator with Column-Wise Compression for Efficient CNN Inference
- Reducing Instruction-Fetch Energy in RISC-V for Embedded AI Processing via Dynamic and Static Loop Caching
- SPARC: Automated Root-Cause Analysis of Pre-Silicon Power Side-Channel Leakage in the Processor Design Flow