Software-to-silicon verification @ 45 nm and beyond
Tom Borgstrom and Badri Gopalan, Synopsys
EE Times (07/13/2009 12:01 AM EDT)
Chip and system developers once considered verification as a secondary activity following the main challenge of design, with the "Designer" playing the central role in a design's success. This notion is firmly turned on its head today, as verification is the biggest component of chip hardware development budgets, schedules, staffing and risk.
With verification complexity growing faster than Moore's Law, compounded by increasing mixed-signal content and advanced low-power design techniques, the importance of verification in the chip hardware development process is certain to increase. In fact, venture capitalists have started focusing on verification costs as a factor in determining which chip startups to fund. Similarly, embedded software used to be a minor or nonexistent deliverable for typical semiconductor devices. At 45 nm and beyond, software accounts for a full 60 percent of total chip-development cost, with major implications on how chips and systems are verified. It is no surprise, then, that the International Technology Roadmap for Semiconductors (ITRS) predicts that, "Without major breakthroughs, verification will be a non-scalable, show-stopping barrier to further progress in the semiconductor industry."
EE Times (07/13/2009 12:01 AM EDT)
Chip and system developers once considered verification as a secondary activity following the main challenge of design, with the "Designer" playing the central role in a design's success. This notion is firmly turned on its head today, as verification is the biggest component of chip hardware development budgets, schedules, staffing and risk.
With verification complexity growing faster than Moore's Law, compounded by increasing mixed-signal content and advanced low-power design techniques, the importance of verification in the chip hardware development process is certain to increase. In fact, venture capitalists have started focusing on verification costs as a factor in determining which chip startups to fund. Similarly, embedded software used to be a minor or nonexistent deliverable for typical semiconductor devices. At 45 nm and beyond, software accounts for a full 60 percent of total chip-development cost, with major implications on how chips and systems are verified. It is no surprise, then, that the International Technology Roadmap for Semiconductors (ITRS) predicts that, "Without major breakthroughs, verification will be a non-scalable, show-stopping barrier to further progress in the semiconductor industry."
To read the full article, click here
Related Semiconductor IP
- Mesochronous Bridge for PCIe/CXL
- AI-native GPU
- OpenGMSL Verification IP
- OpenGMSL Leaf IP
- FlexGen Multi-Die Smart Network-on-Chip (NoC) IP
Related Articles
- CDC verification of billion-gate SoCs
- MBIST verification: Best practices & challenges
- Multi-faceted design verification
- Challenges and Benefits of Low Power Design Verification with CPF for a standalone IP
Latest Articles
- FlexSpIM: An Event-Based Digital Compute-In-Memory Accelerator with Flexible Operand Resolution and Layer-Wise Hybrid Stationarity
- MeshKV: A Network-on-Chip KV Cache Fabric for Scalable Transformer Decoding Accelerators
- Analog Pin Directionality as an Exfiltration Attack Surface in Mixed-Signal ICs
- SIMT-Aware Lockstep Verification and Functional-Coverage Closure Methodology for an Open-Source RISC-V GPGPU: A UVM 1.2 Environment
- Efficient Hardware Information-Flow Tracking for Pre-Silicon Security Testing