How to achieve faster compile times in high-density FPGAs
By Phil Simpson and Ajay Jagtiani, Altera
January 17, 2007 -- pldesignline.com
With FPGA design complexity outpacing CPU speed, FPGA designers are more dependent on design tools and methodologies that speed compile times.
Over the last eight years there has been a 30× increase in logic density and memory bits in FPGA devices. The largest FPGAs – such as the recently announced Stratix III EP3SL340 from Altera – contain up to 338,000 equivalent logic elements (LEs) and more than 17 Mbits of embedded memory.
This rapid increase in logic density translates to an even larger increase in computing requirements for design compilation and place and route. Unfortunately, CPU speed has only increased by a factor of 11× during the same period. With FPGA design complexity outpacing CPU speed, FPGA designers are more dependent on design tools and methodologies that speed compile times and allow them to iteratively and efficiently debug, add features, and close timing. This article presents a three-stage methodology to increase productivity for engineers designing with high-end FPGAs.
January 17, 2007 -- pldesignline.com
With FPGA design complexity outpacing CPU speed, FPGA designers are more dependent on design tools and methodologies that speed compile times.
Over the last eight years there has been a 30× increase in logic density and memory bits in FPGA devices. The largest FPGAs – such as the recently announced Stratix III EP3SL340 from Altera – contain up to 338,000 equivalent logic elements (LEs) and more than 17 Mbits of embedded memory.
This rapid increase in logic density translates to an even larger increase in computing requirements for design compilation and place and route. Unfortunately, CPU speed has only increased by a factor of 11× during the same period. With FPGA design complexity outpacing CPU speed, FPGA designers are more dependent on design tools and methodologies that speed compile times and allow them to iteratively and efficiently debug, add features, and close timing. This article presents a three-stage methodology to increase productivity for engineers designing with high-end FPGAs.
To read the full article, click here
Related Semiconductor IP
- TSMC 7nm 0V75 / 0V9 ESD Local Clamp – Low Cap
- TSMC 65nm 3V3 ESD Local Clamp – Rad Hard
- TSMC 5nm 1V8, 1.2V and 0.9V ESD Local Protection – Low Cap
- TSMC 3nm 3V3 ESD Local Clamp
- TSMC 3nm 1V2 ESD Local Clamp – Low Capacitance
Related Articles
- Growing demand for high-speed data in consumer devices gives rise to new generation of low-end FPGAs
- How to Design SmartNICs Using FPGAs to Increase Server Compute Capacity
- How to achieve better IoT security in Wi-Fi modules
- How to manage changing IP in an evolving SoC design
Latest Articles
- LACE: Large Language Model Aided Multi-Agent Framework for Agile RISC-V Instruction Extension
- A Process-Aware Hybrid Si/IGO Monolithic-3D 6T SRAM with BEOL Pass-Gates for the 2nm Node
- Automated Estimation of MBIST Area and Test Time in Heterogeneous Memory IPs via Stacked Ensemble Framework
- VIPER: Architecture-Aware Performance Modeling for Processing-in-Memory Design-Space Exploration
- CTTE: An Open Dual-Protocol RISC-V Trace Encoder for N-Trace and E-Trace