Choosing an effective embedded SoC ASIC design strategy
Sunit Bansal, Freescale Semiconductor Inc.
EETimes (12/13/2010 8:18 PM EST)
In large and complex system-0n-chip ASIC design, two of the most challenging tasks are those involving design closure, timing routing and power.
It is a tedious task to converge on timing and routing, owing to the limitations of design size and the memory-intensive calculations. Essentially, it is dependent on the design size that an EDA tool can handle.
In such cases, it is advisable to go for a hierarchical approach instead of a flat top. Generally, the blocks are demarcated on the basis of functionality, backward compatibility, third party IP etc.
This article details the difference in terms of runtimes, routing congestion, timing summary and utilization for a design that is done as hierarchical vs. the same design using the flat approach.
To read the full article, click here
Related Semiconductor IP
- Chiplet Die-to-Die Interconnect IP Solution
- High speed MACsec Engine 100G/200G/400G/800G/1.6T
- Temperature/Voltage sensors
- AMBA Bus Host to eSPI Controller/Target
- AMBA Bus Host to eSPI Controller
Related Articles
- Optimize SoC Design with a Network-on-Chip Strategy
- FPGA to ASIC Strategy for Communication SoC Designs
- An Efficient Device for Forward Collision Warning Using Low Cost Stereo Camera & Embedded SoC
- Testing Of Repairable Embedded Memories in SoC: Approach and Challenges
Latest Articles
- ZK-Flex: A Flexible and Scalable Framework for Accelerating Zero-Knowledge Proofs
- ITP-STDP: An Intrinsic-Timing Power-of-Two Learning Engine for On-Chip SNN Training
- OpenEye: A Scalable Open-Source Hardware Accelerator for DNNs
- CHIMERA: A Flexible and Scalable 3.1 TOPS/W AI-MCU with Transformer Accelerator and 563 Gb/s Shared-L2 Memory Subsystem with QoS Guarantees
- CXL-ClusterSim: Modeling CXL-based Disaggregated Memory Cluster for Pooling and Sharing using gem5 and SST