Characterizing licensable core performance; Find out why comparing processor cores is tricky and learn what to look for.
[Editor's note: If you are unfamiliar with the concepts of chip fabrication, the article "Push performance and power beyond the data sheet" provides some useful background.]
Comparing licensable processor cores and quantifying their relative performance is challenging. Unlike processor chips, there are many different ways in which licensable cores can be configured, implemented, and fabricated, each of which yields a different combination of speed, area, and power consumption. Particularly for digital signal processing applications (which tend to push the limits on one or more of these metrics) it's essential to have reliable and accurate performance data.
To make apples-to-apples comparisons between cores you'll need to pin down a consistent set of assumptions. In this article, we'll discuss some of the factors to consider when assessing and comparing licensable cores for digital signal processing.
To read the full article, click here
Related Semiconductor IP
- Mesochronous Bridge for PCIe/CXL
- AI-native GPU
- OpenGMSL Verification IP
- OpenGMSL Leaf IP
- FlexGen Multi-Die Smart Network-on-Chip (NoC) IP
Related Articles
- Agile Analog's Approach to Analog IP Design and Quality --- Why "Silicon Proven" is NOT What You Think
- Find out what's really inside the iPod; Reuse of components is a good design practice for similar applications, including mobile handsets
- Performance analysis of 8-bit pipelined Asynchronous Processor core
- Why VAD and what solution to choose?
Latest Articles
- FlexSpIM: An Event-Based Digital Compute-In-Memory Accelerator with Flexible Operand Resolution and Layer-Wise Hybrid Stationarity
- MeshKV: A Network-on-Chip KV Cache Fabric for Scalable Transformer Decoding Accelerators
- Analog Pin Directionality as an Exfiltration Attack Surface in Mixed-Signal ICs
- SIMT-Aware Lockstep Verification and Functional-Coverage Closure Methodology for an Open-Source RISC-V GPGPU: A UVM 1.2 Environment
- Efficient Hardware Information-Flow Tracking for Pre-Silicon Security Testing