What does the Lattice rejection mean for chip M&A?
Although the rejection of the Lattice deal was expected, it none the less has an impact on a number of dynamics in the chip industry and further M&A and consolidation. Freezing out China removes a "catalyst" in the market which help bid up values and add fear to both potential targets or those left out. Cross border deals are obviously more difficult to get done and even small deals with China will likely be put under a microscope now.
The Xcerra deal is likely very safe given the size and lack of critical technology. Much like the Mattson deal before it, China will only be allowed to acquire second or third tier small chip companies with no unique technology or critical market position.
Does this slow down China's chip ambitions?
Does this slow down M&A and consolidation further?
Does this negatively impact future sales of equipment to China?
To read the full article, click here
Related Semiconductor IP
- CRYSTALS Dilithium core for accelerating NIST FIPS 204 Module Lattice Digital Signature algorithm
- Highly configurable HW Lattice PQC ultra acceleration in AXI4 & PCIe systems
- Single instance HW Lattice PQC ultra accelerator
- Lattice Mico8 Open, Free Soft Microcontroller
- SubLVDS to MIPI CSI-2 Image Sensor Bridge
Related Blogs
- What the Cyber Resilience Act means for the future of chip design
- Beyond Trusted: What the NSA’s New Guidance Means for Hardware Security
- What does Amazon's multiday cloud outage mean for EDA cloud services?
- What Does SystemC Mean for Design and Verification?
Latest Blogs
- From Bug Hunting to Engineering Methodology: Lessons from AI-Driven Development
- Manufacturing Intelligence: Turning EDA Data into Trusted Action
- Execute-in-Place: Getting More from Embedded NVM
- Rethinking RTL flows with AI-driven hybrid formal verification
- Arm and NVIDIA: Building the trusted compute foundation for the agentic AI era