Did Intel Fall For A Techno-Ponzi Scheme?
September 15, 2016
Did Intel management fall for that decades old Techno-Ponzi scheme – phase change memory.
A hilarious piece in Semiaccurate points out that on launch in July 2015 the claim for 3D XPoint was: 1000x faster than NAND, 1000x the endurance of NAND, and 10x denser than DRAM.
To read the full article, click here
Related Semiconductor IP
- nQrux® Root of Trust IP
- AXI to UCIe Bridge IP
- UCIe 2.x Controller IP
- SWI3S (SoundWire I3S Interface) Peripheral Controller Core IP
- OpenTitan-based RISC-V Secure Element
Related Blogs
- When Memory Shortages Change Architecture Decisions
- Why Intel 14nm is NOT a Game Changer!
- Xilinx unleashes triad of low-power, 28nm FPGA families with very promising characteristics for memory interfacing
- Anti-Fuse Memory With Gusto
Latest Blogs
- From Bug Hunting to Engineering Methodology: Lessons from AI-Driven Development
- Manufacturing Intelligence: Turning EDA Data into Trusted Action
- Execute-in-Place: Getting More from Embedded NVM
- Rethinking RTL flows with AI-driven hybrid formal verification
- Arm and NVIDIA: Building the trusted compute foundation for the agentic AI era