Why Intel 14nm is NOT a Game Changer!
February 3, 2014
On one hand the Motley Fool is saying, “Intel 14nm could change the game” and on the other hand the Wall Street Cheat Sheet is saying, “Intel should shut down mobile”. SemiWiki says Intel missed mobile and should look to the future and focus on wearables and in this blog I will argue why.
Let’s look back to 2009 when Intel and TSMC signed an agreement to “collaborate on addressing technology platform, intellectual property (IP) infrastructure, and System-on-Chip (SoC) solutions.” Intel and TSMC ported the Atom Core to 40nm and offered it to more than 1,000 of TSMC’s customers:
To read the full article, click here
Related Semiconductor IP
- MIPI C‑PHY/D‑PHY IP on TSMC N2P
- Ultra-Low Latency 32Gbps SerDes IP in TSMC 12nm FFC
- Ultra-Low Latency 32Gbps SerDes IP in TSMC 22nm ULP
- 32Gbps SerDes IP in TSMC 12nm FFC
- 32Gbps SerDes IP in TSMC 22nm ULP
Related Blogs
- Power, Not Area: Why Edge GPU Design Is Entering a New Era
- Bridging the Gap: Why eFPGA Integration is a Managed Reality, Not a Schedule Risk
- Why eMMC is still a good low-budget storage option?
- Why is Hard IP a Better Solution for Embedded FPGA (eFPGA) Technology?
Latest Blogs
- CDM Dependence on Device Capacitance
- What the Cyber Resilience Act means for the future of chip design
- When Your IP Vendor Has Operated 150,000 Base Stations: Introducing Viettel Semiconductor
- Relationship between architecture and validation in system design
- The Post-Quantum Cryptography Mandate: Building Cryptographically Agile Systems for the Quantum Era