Why Intel 14nm is NOT a Game Changer!
February 3, 2014
On one hand the Motley Fool is saying, “Intel 14nm could change the game” and on the other hand the Wall Street Cheat Sheet is saying, “Intel should shut down mobile”. SemiWiki says Intel missed mobile and should look to the future and focus on wearables and in this blog I will argue why.
Let’s look back to 2009 when Intel and TSMC signed an agreement to “collaborate on addressing technology platform, intellectual property (IP) infrastructure, and System-on-Chip (SoC) solutions.” Intel and TSMC ported the Atom Core to 40nm and offered it to more than 1,000 of TSMC’s customers:
To read the full article, click here
Related Semiconductor IP
- 12-bit, 400 MSPS SAR ADC - TSMC 12nm FFC
- 3.3V Capable GPIO on TSMC 28nm RF HPC+
- 1.2V Thin Oxide GPIO on TSMC 28nm RF HPC+
- LDO Voltage Regulator, 250 mA, TSMC N3P
- LDO Voltage Regulator, Adjustable 0.45 V to 0.9 V Output, 30 mA, TSMC N3P
Related Blogs
- Power, Not Area: Why Edge GPU Design Is Entering a New Era
- Bridging the Gap: Why eFPGA Integration is a Managed Reality, Not a Schedule Risk
- Why is Hard IP a Better Solution for Embedded FPGA (eFPGA) Technology?
- USB4 Sideband Channel Is Not a Side Business
Latest Blogs
- Designing for What Comes Next in AI
- Secure boot on Efinix Titanium Ti60: Getting started with KiviBoot-Tiny
- How Long Does It Take to Port a New AI Model? Minutes Now, and Falling
- PCI Express Security and TEE Integration, Part 1 - Establishing Trust
- World Models at the Edge, in Real Time: V-JEPA 2.1 on the Quadric GPNPU