Why Intel 14nm is NOT a Game Changer!
On one hand the Motley Fool is saying, “Intel 14nm could change the game” and on the other hand the Wall Street Cheat Sheet is saying, “Intel should shut down mobile”. SemiWiki says Intel missed mobile and should look to the future and focus on wearables and in this blog I will argue why.
Let’s look back to 2009 when Intel and TSMC signed an agreement to “collaborate on addressing technology platform, intellectual property (IP) infrastructure, and System-on-Chip (SoC) solutions.” Intel and TSMC ported the Atom Core to 40nm and offered it to more than 1,000 of TSMC’s customers:
To read the full article, click here
Related Semiconductor IP
- Ultra-Low Latency 32Gbps SerDes IP in TSMC 12nm FFC
- Ultra-Low Latency 32Gbps SerDes IP in TSMC 22nm ULP
- 32Gbps SerDes IP in TSMC 12nm FFC
- 32Gbps SerDes IP in TSMC 22nm ULP
- MIPI D-PHY and FPD-Link (LVDS) Combinational Transmitter for TSMC 22nm ULP
Related Blogs
- Power, Not Area: Why Edge GPU Design Is Entering a New Era
- Bridging the Gap: Why eFPGA Integration is a Managed Reality, Not a Schedule Risk
- Why eMMC is still a good low-budget storage option?
- Why is Hard IP a Better Solution for Embedded FPGA (eFPGA) Technology?
Latest Blogs
- Embedded Security explained: Advanced Encryption Standard (AES)
- Cadence Demonstrates PCIe 8.0 PHY at PCI-SIG DevCon 2026
- Cadence Achieves Successful Silicon Validation of 1st IP Test Chips on Intel 18A
- From Classical CAN and CAN FD to CAN XL: Functional Safety and Security for Next-Generation In-Vehicle Communication
- Accelerating Embedded Memory Performance with 16-bit xSPI PSRAM IP