RF integration: Full SoC, or just a SiP?
Janine Love
(01/14/2008 9:00 AM EST) - EE Times
The radio-frequency circuitry in mobile and portable devices remains some of the most resistant to integration. RF devices are very picky about who their neighbors are, and they sometimes find surprising ways to add interference to the signals they are responsible for handling. In the push for smaller footprints, the RF circuitry needs to shrink. The question is, what should be integrated, how, and how much?
There are competing strategies here: Integrate the power amplifier (PA) with the transceiver in a system-on-chip (SoC), leave it to stand alone, or combine it with the passive and control circuitry that is off-chip in a system-in-package (SiP). Which one is the winner? For applications requiring low output power and short ranges (think Bluetooth), the answer is SoC all the way. For applications requiring long range and high output power (think 802.11n WLAN connections), the best bet is to go with a SiP for the RF front-end circuitry (the PA, maybe the low-noise amplifier, matching circuitry, passives, switches, etc.). The standalone PA may be left out in the cold.
(01/14/2008 9:00 AM EST) - EE Times
The radio-frequency circuitry in mobile and portable devices remains some of the most resistant to integration. RF devices are very picky about who their neighbors are, and they sometimes find surprising ways to add interference to the signals they are responsible for handling. In the push for smaller footprints, the RF circuitry needs to shrink. The question is, what should be integrated, how, and how much?
There are competing strategies here: Integrate the power amplifier (PA) with the transceiver in a system-on-chip (SoC), leave it to stand alone, or combine it with the passive and control circuitry that is off-chip in a system-in-package (SiP). Which one is the winner? For applications requiring low output power and short ranges (think Bluetooth), the answer is SoC all the way. For applications requiring long range and high output power (think 802.11n WLAN connections), the best bet is to go with a SiP for the RF front-end circuitry (the PA, maybe the low-noise amplifier, matching circuitry, passives, switches, etc.). The standalone PA may be left out in the cold.
To read the full article, click here
Related Semiconductor IP
- nQrux® Root of Trust IP
- AXI to UCIe Bridge IP
- UCIe 2.x Controller IP
- SWI3S (SoundWire I3S Interface) Peripheral Controller Core IP
- OpenTitan-based RISC-V Secure Element
Related Articles
- RF front-ends for GSM mobile handsets continue down path of integration
- RF integration: Changing the face of test
- Digital RF techniques ease chip integration challenges
- A cost-effective and highly productive Framework for IP Integration in SoC using pre-defined language sensitive Editors (LSE) templates and effectively using System Verilog Interfaces
Latest Articles
- A Secure dToF LiDAR SoC with Dual-Domain Fingerprinting and Event-Driven AFE Circuit Achieving Sensor-Level Attack Resilience
- ZTA-Q: an Open-source RISC-V Platform for Accurate Quantized CNN Inference
- Automated Pre-Silicon Verification of High-Speed DDR5 and LPDDR5/6 Memory Controllers: Closed-Loop Timing, Mode Register, and PHY Synchronization in UVM
- U-Sonic: An Open-Source 8-Channel Ultrasound Transmit IP in a 130 nm RISC-V SoC
- S-ALSA: Co-Design of Adiabatic Logic-based Sensing and Balanced Bit-Cells for Secure and Energy-Efficient MRAM