Pragmatic Adoption of Formal Analysis
Anders Nordstrom, Cadence Design Systems, Inc.
(03/29/2007 9:10 AM EDT), EE Times
Introduction
Verification of today's system-on-chip (SoC) designs is a hard problem that keeps getting harder. Design size and complexity continually increase, while the market demands ever-tighter development schedules. Multiple approaches such as directed and coverage-driven random simulations, assertion-based verification, and formal analysis are needed to most effectively verify a chip. This article focuses specifically on the technique of formal analysis and discusses how to adopt it efficiently on SoC projects.
(03/29/2007 9:10 AM EDT), EE Times
Introduction
Verification of today's system-on-chip (SoC) designs is a hard problem that keeps getting harder. Design size and complexity continually increase, while the market demands ever-tighter development schedules. Multiple approaches such as directed and coverage-driven random simulations, assertion-based verification, and formal analysis are needed to most effectively verify a chip. This article focuses specifically on the technique of formal analysis and discusses how to adopt it efficiently on SoC projects.
To read the full article, click here
Related Semiconductor IP
- Mesochronous Bridge for PCIe/CXL
- AI-native GPU
- OpenGMSL Verification IP
- OpenGMSL Leaf IP
- FlexGen Multi-Die Smart Network-on-Chip (NoC) IP
Related Articles
- Getting the most out of formal analysis
- Formal Verification IPs: the corner stone for a broader adoption of Formal Verification
- Case Study: Can you afford to ignore formal analysis?
- Using verification coverage with formal analysis
Latest Articles
- FlexSpIM: An Event-Based Digital Compute-In-Memory Accelerator with Flexible Operand Resolution and Layer-Wise Hybrid Stationarity
- MeshKV: A Network-on-Chip KV Cache Fabric for Scalable Transformer Decoding Accelerators
- Analog Pin Directionality as an Exfiltration Attack Surface in Mixed-Signal ICs
- SIMT-Aware Lockstep Verification and Functional-Coverage Closure Methodology for an Open-Source RISC-V GPGPU: A UVM 1.2 Environment
- Efficient Hardware Information-Flow Tracking for Pre-Silicon Security Testing