Reducing Power in Embedded Systems by Adding Hardware Accelerators
By Rodney Frazer, Altera
Embedded.com -- (04/09/08, 03:21:00 PM EDT)
The rule of thumb in embedded system design has been that adding hardware increases power demands. The careful use of hardware accelerators, however, inverts the rule: adding hardware can reduce power.
By analyzing algorithms and implementing appropriate accelerators in programmable logic, developers can increase a design's performance while reducing power consumption in an embedded computing system.
Test results show that accelerators extend tradeoff options from as much as 200-fold performance improvement for the same power to the same performance with a 90% power reduction.
Programmable logic has, somewhat undeservedly, maintained a reputation from its early history as being a power-hungry approach to logic design. The rules of thumb have been that power consumption in an integrated circuit is roughly proportional to the chip's area for a given process technology, and a design implemented in programmable logic tends to be larger than if implemented in hard-wired logic. But these two factors, although suggestive, are misleading.
Embedded.com -- (04/09/08, 03:21:00 PM EDT)
The rule of thumb in embedded system design has been that adding hardware increases power demands. The careful use of hardware accelerators, however, inverts the rule: adding hardware can reduce power.
By analyzing algorithms and implementing appropriate accelerators in programmable logic, developers can increase a design's performance while reducing power consumption in an embedded computing system.
Test results show that accelerators extend tradeoff options from as much as 200-fold performance improvement for the same power to the same performance with a 90% power reduction.
Programmable logic has, somewhat undeservedly, maintained a reputation from its early history as being a power-hungry approach to logic design. The rules of thumb have been that power consumption in an integrated circuit is roughly proportional to the chip's area for a given process technology, and a design implemented in programmable logic tends to be larger than if implemented in hard-wired logic. But these two factors, although suggestive, are misleading.
To read the full article, click here
Related Semiconductor IP
- Generative AI Edge Processor
- AXI NoC Non-Coherent Mesh
- CXS c/d/Lite Verification IP
- USB OTG 2.0 with xHCI Verification IP
- DDR5 RDIMM Verification IP
Related Articles
- H.264 Baseline Encoder with ADI Blackfin DSP and Hardware Accelerators
- Programmable accelerators: hardware performance with software flexibility
- H.264 Baseline Decoder With ADI Blackfin DSP and Hardware Accelerators
- 20th Anniversary article: Full simulations with partial hardware
Latest Articles
- BARE-AI: Bit-Flip Attack Resilience in AI Hardware through Built-in Performance Monitors
- RFChipAgent: Multi-Agentic AI Flow for Analog/RF Chip Design
- Anechoic: Onsager-Corrected Parallel Annealing for Sub-0.1 ms Dense Max-Cut on an FPGA
- Power, Performance, and Area of HPC-Based Malware Detectors: An FPGA and Open-PDK ASIC Study
- Terracotta: Enabling the Adoption of New DRAM Techniques via a Flexible DRAM Interface and Memory Controller