Reducing Power in Embedded Systems by Adding Hardware Accelerators
By Rodney Frazer, Altera
Embedded.com -- (04/09/08, 03:21:00 PM EDT)
The rule of thumb in embedded system design has been that adding hardware increases power demands. The careful use of hardware accelerators, however, inverts the rule: adding hardware can reduce power.
By analyzing algorithms and implementing appropriate accelerators in programmable logic, developers can increase a design's performance while reducing power consumption in an embedded computing system.
Test results show that accelerators extend tradeoff options from as much as 200-fold performance improvement for the same power to the same performance with a 90% power reduction.
Programmable logic has, somewhat undeservedly, maintained a reputation from its early history as being a power-hungry approach to logic design. The rules of thumb have been that power consumption in an integrated circuit is roughly proportional to the chip's area for a given process technology, and a design implemented in programmable logic tends to be larger than if implemented in hard-wired logic. But these two factors, although suggestive, are misleading.
Embedded.com -- (04/09/08, 03:21:00 PM EDT)
The rule of thumb in embedded system design has been that adding hardware increases power demands. The careful use of hardware accelerators, however, inverts the rule: adding hardware can reduce power.
By analyzing algorithms and implementing appropriate accelerators in programmable logic, developers can increase a design's performance while reducing power consumption in an embedded computing system.
Test results show that accelerators extend tradeoff options from as much as 200-fold performance improvement for the same power to the same performance with a 90% power reduction.
Programmable logic has, somewhat undeservedly, maintained a reputation from its early history as being a power-hungry approach to logic design. The rules of thumb have been that power consumption in an integrated circuit is roughly proportional to the chip's area for a given process technology, and a design implemented in programmable logic tends to be larger than if implemented in hard-wired logic. But these two factors, although suggestive, are misleading.
To read the full article, click here
Related Semiconductor IP
- Mesochronous Bridge for PCIe/CXL
- AI-native GPU
- OpenGMSL Verification IP
- OpenGMSL Leaf IP
- FlexGen Multi-Die Smart Network-on-Chip (NoC) IP
Related Articles
- H.264 Baseline Encoder with ADI Blackfin DSP and Hardware Accelerators
- Programmable accelerators: hardware performance with software flexibility
- H.264 Baseline Decoder With ADI Blackfin DSP and Hardware Accelerators
- Mobile video: ARM vs. DSP vs. hardware
Latest Articles
- FlexSpIM: An Event-Based Digital Compute-In-Memory Accelerator with Flexible Operand Resolution and Layer-Wise Hybrid Stationarity
- MeshKV: A Network-on-Chip KV Cache Fabric for Scalable Transformer Decoding Accelerators
- Analog Pin Directionality as an Exfiltration Attack Surface in Mixed-Signal ICs
- SIMT-Aware Lockstep Verification and Functional-Coverage Closure Methodology for an Open-Source RISC-V GPGPU: A UVM 1.2 Environment
- Efficient Hardware Information-Flow Tracking for Pre-Silicon Security Testing