Design Implications of USB Type-C
Brian Fuller, Editor in Chief, Cadence Designs Systems
EETimes (5/12/2015 03:07 PM EDT)
USB Type-C is a very big deal for the USB community and IP developers. What are the gotchas? Is there no pain with this gain?
Remember the old spiritual? “Toe bone connected to the foot bone; Foot bone connected to the heel bone,” etc.? I hum that sometimes when I’m trying to figure out how to navigate the innumerable and multi-generational USB cables lying around the house.
With USB, there’s always been a Type-A connector and a different Type-B connector and therefore different device slots to find and fit. But those “which way is up?” days are fast coming to close with the launch of USB Type-C, a universal bidirectional cable that’s being designed in as we speak to devices around the world.
To read the full article, click here
Related Semiconductor IP
- USB TYPE-C Verification IP
- USB Type-C and Power Delivery Verification IP
- Fully Self-contained Single/Multi Port USB Type-C Power Delivery IP
- USB Type-C Authentication IP
- Complete USB Type-C Power Delivery IP
Related Articles
- USB 3.1 implementation of USB Type-C
- Addressing Three Critical Challenges of USB Type-C Implementation
- Securing the Most Important Goal of USB Type-C Technology: A Better User Experience
- Designing AC/DC Adaptors for USB Type-C Power
Latest Articles
- LACE: Large Language Model Aided Multi-Agent Framework for Agile RISC-V Instruction Extension
- A Process-Aware Hybrid Si/IGO Monolithic-3D 6T SRAM with BEOL Pass-Gates for the 2nm Node
- Automated Estimation of MBIST Area and Test Time in Heterogeneous Memory IPs via Stacked Ensemble Framework
- VIPER: Architecture-Aware Performance Modeling for Processing-in-Memory Design-Space Exploration
- CTTE: An Open Dual-Protocol RISC-V Trace Encoder for N-Trace and E-Trace