Common programming models for use on a dual-core processor
By Rick Gentile and David Katz, Analog Devices , Embedded.com
Mar 22 2006 (12:05 PM), Embedded.com
As embedded processors become more computationally capable, many new (and more advanced) algorithms can be ported, which in turn enable new applications. The most flexible architectures scale from low-end to high-end applications, enabling a common development platform across projects as well as providing more flexibility for development teams.
One way processor vendors provide the desired scalability with a single architecture is to include both single- and dual-core platforms. The goal with a multi-core processor is to allow nearly ideal scaling without overcomplicating the programming model. For example, in a dual-core system, the goal is to achieve as close to a 2x performance increase as possible.
In this paper, we will discuss the most common programming techniques for maximizing performance, as well as some system-related topics that commonly arise when porting to a dual-core processor.
Mar 22 2006 (12:05 PM), Embedded.com
As embedded processors become more computationally capable, many new (and more advanced) algorithms can be ported, which in turn enable new applications. The most flexible architectures scale from low-end to high-end applications, enabling a common development platform across projects as well as providing more flexibility for development teams.
One way processor vendors provide the desired scalability with a single architecture is to include both single- and dual-core platforms. The goal with a multi-core processor is to allow nearly ideal scaling without overcomplicating the programming model. For example, in a dual-core system, the goal is to achieve as close to a 2x performance increase as possible.
In this paper, we will discuss the most common programming techniques for maximizing performance, as well as some system-related topics that commonly arise when porting to a dual-core processor.
To read the full article, click here
Related Semiconductor IP
- DFI 6.0 Verification IP
- TSMC 7nm 0V75 / 0V9 ESD Local Clamp – Low Cap
- TSMC 65nm 3V3 ESD Local Clamp – Rad Hard
- TSMC 5nm 1V8, 1.2V and 0.9V ESD Local Protection – Low Cap
- TSMC 3nm 3V3 ESD Local Clamp
Related Articles
- Interstellar: Fully Partitioned and Efficient Security Monitoring Hardware Near a Processor Core for Protecting Systems against Attacks on Privileged Software
- MPEG-4 is accelerated and footprint reduced by use of a configurable processor core
- Choosing between dual and single core media processor configurations in embedded multimedia designs
- Development and use of an Instruction Set Simulator of 68000-compatible processor core
Latest Articles
- Scalable AXI4 Transaction Monitoring for Mixed-Criticality SoCs: From Phase-Level Precision to ID-Level Efficiency
- Hardware-managed heterogeneous high-bandwidth memory and flash in LLM inference systems
- LACE: Large Language Model Aided Multi-Agent Framework for Agile RISC-V Instruction Extension
- A Process-Aware Hybrid Si/IGO Monolithic-3D 6T SRAM with BEOL Pass-Gates for the 2nm Node
- Automated Estimation of MBIST Area and Test Time in Heterogeneous Memory IPs via Stacked Ensemble Framework