IP integration: Is it the real system-level design?
The search for productivity in SOC (system-on-chip) design is a search for balance between abstraction and automation. Greater abstraction at a step in the design flow means fewer design elements to process. Greater automation means that each element requires less human attention. Ideally, designers could capture an abstract representation of an SOC’s intended behavior, verify that the representation describes the desired chip, and push a button to tape-out. We are not yet there.
For years, some enthusiasts have promoted high-level design languages—often dialects of C—as the path to greater abstraction. Except in a few categories of architectural elements, however, it has been difficult to move the design beyond behavioral or transaction-level representation and into the implementation flow. “High-level synthesis is still very domain-specific,” says Ken Wagner, PMC-Sierra’s vice president of engineering. Without synthesis, designers must recode the high-level version by hand into RTL (register-transfer-level) logic.
To read the full article, click here
Related Semiconductor IP
Related Blogs
- As Vehicles Become Data Centers: Why Interface IP Integration Matters in SoC Design
- I3C IP: Enabling Efficient Communication and Sensor Integration
- Advanced SoC Development Uses Next-Gen IP Integration Tools
- Navigating the challenges of manual IP design migrations
Latest Blogs
- Pioneering Secure-by-Design in the Age of the European CRA
- Overcoming power management IP challenges
- Running OpenCode with llama.cpp and Qwen 3.5 on E-Series
- Automated, Faster Specification to Sign-Off with IDS-AI
- NovaTech Automation Crius PIU: Bringing Conventional Instrument Transformers onto the IEC 61850 Process Bus