Throughput, not productivity, is what matters
December 14, 2010
Discussions about R&D return-on-investment (RoI) among semiconductor industry executives often turn to engineering productivity. They're often surprised when I assert that productivity isn't that important—at least as far as R&D performance metrics are concerned. A far more important metric is engineering throughput.
Throughput measures rate of output and therefore quantifies how fast you develop products. Productivity measures how efficiently you develop them. Throughput is about cycle time. Productivity is about cost. The more productive your teams, the fewer engineers needed to develop products—hence the lower the development cost. But what's more important, cost or time-to-market?
To read the full article, click here
Related Semiconductor IP
- Zigbee Transceiver PHY
- Data Flow Architecture IP
- AMBA SPI Controller MRAM Controller
- Ethernet MAC
- Protocol Bridges
Related Blogs
- Falling IC development productivity means lost engineering jobs
- Open-Silicon adds Silicon Logic Engineering - for a good reason
- Abstract Made Concrete: Software Reverse Engineering – Mike McLean of UBM TechInsights Comments on the Bilski Case
- The most important R&D performance metrics
Latest Blogs
- IDS-NoC: A Scalable Interconnect Solution for Modern SoC Design
- Leading-edge AI IC designs demand comprehensive HAV methodologies
- Beyond the Fab: Building Europe’s Next Generation of Semiconductor Champions
- AI Semiconductor Design at 3nm and 2nm: Silicon-Proven IP
- Samsung Foundry and Cadence Expand Infrastructure and Physical AI Solution