The politics of productivity
March 30, 2011
Politics and productivity seem to go hand-in-hand in semiconductor R&D organizations. Perhaps it's natural. No manager or project team wants the low productivity Scarlet Letter. So it's hardly surprising that ostensibly poor performers use politics to avoid scrutiny.
But are these so-called low productivity projects really poor performers? In fact, many are not. Quite the opposite in fact—they often have high productivity (although insufficient throughput) but are mistakenly pigeonholed because their crime was a missed schedule. Moreover, schedule overrun usually is not due to low productivity.
To read the full article, click here
Related Semiconductor IP
- Chiplet Die-to-Die Interconnect IP Solution
- High speed MACsec Engine 100G/200G/400G/800G/1.6T
- Temperature/Voltage sensors
- AMBA Bus Host to eSPI Controller/Target
- AMBA Bus Host to eSPI Controller
Related Blogs
- Throughput, not productivity, is what matters
- In search of best-in-class R&D organizations
- Semiconductor Growth from AI-Driven Design Productivity
- Falling IC development productivity means lost engineering jobs
Latest Blogs
- Cadence Achieves Successful Silicon Validation of 1st IP Test Chips on Intel 18A
- From Classical CAN and CAN FD to CAN XL: Functional Safety and Security for Next-Generation In-Vehicle Communication
- Accelerating Embedded Memory Performance with 16-bit xSPI PSRAM IP
- Why nonce reuse can break AES-GCM security in embedded systems
- PQSecure™-Agility Earns NIST CAVP Validation