Delivering a Better Support Experience for IP Customers
Has this happened to you? You decide to include third-party commercial IP cores to reduce risk and time to market. You spend months defining requirements, researching available IP, evaluating vendors, then cycling through technical questions and licensing options until you finally select and license the IP core that seems best for your project. You expect to drop the IP into your design, compile, test and hit your project milestones.
But things might not go as easily as expected. Perhaps you have an issue compiling the design, or the testing results don’t make sense. So, you email the IP supplier’s help desk hoping for a quick resolution, while your development work is partially on hold until you get a satisfying answer.
All support systems initially rely on the problem being routed to the appropriate engineer to correctly interpret the issue. The “appropriate” engineer is critical, as not every engineer can properly assess a given issue in a timely manner. What happens after that person receives your issue can vary widely among IP providers.
To read the full article, click here
Related Semiconductor IP
- RDMA IP
- PCIe Controller
- USB Controller
- MTP (Multi-Time Programmable) IP
- OTP (One-Time Programmable) IP
Related Blogs
- Why is Hard IP a Better Solution for Embedded FPGA (eFPGA) Technology?
- Crypto mining SoC unearths a need for custom IP
- World's First Standards-Compliant 112G PHY IP for Linear Optics: A Turning Point for AI Interconnects
- Could "Less than Moore" be better to support Mobile segment explosion?
Latest Blogs
- SiFive Perspective: RISC-V SPMP Specification Ratification is a Leap Forward for Embedded Security
- From AI-Assisted EDA to AI-Mediated Engineering
- Simplifying Multi-Domain Voltage-Control Verification with Synopsys AVSBus 2.0 VIP
- The Cyber Resilience Act Is Turning Hardware Security into an Evidence Question
- Inside the Arm Mali G2-Ultra NX GPU: Delivering desktop-class mobile gameplay with AI-native graphics