Build or Buy? The Design Rules Remain the Same
The last time I visited the "build or buy" issue, a lot of small commercial engineering outfits were looking to the big companies for in-house support for their various products for the burgeoning wireless market.
With the technology and complexity of self-contained RF systems having advanced much in the past 15 years, I'm sure the major IC companies and module makers still get involved with the little guy but the details are usually sparse due to the nature of today's non-disclosure agreements. On the other hand, build-versus-buy is largely the same issue at university labs and applied-research houses, where performance isn't necessarily measured in commercial terms and where meeting tight timetables and cost budgets aren't always the biggest driving factors.
So what are the general design rules? I reckon they're largely unknown to the current crop of today's young engineers, but they are relatively simple and unchanged, albeit counter-intuitive.
To read the full article, click here
Related Semiconductor IP
- Zigbee Transceiver PHY
- Data Flow Architecture IP
- AMBA SPI Controller MRAM Controller
- Ethernet MAC
- Protocol Bridges
Related Blogs
- The Hidden Threat in Analog IC Migration: Why Electromigration rules can make or break your next tapeout
- Building Smarter, Faster: How Arm Compute Subsystems Accelerate the Future of Chip Design
- Analog Design and Layout Migration automation in the AI era
- Cadence at the TSMC OIP: Pioneering the Future of Semiconductor Design
Latest Blogs
- IDS-NoC: A Scalable Interconnect Solution for Modern SoC Design
- Leading-edge AI IC designs demand comprehensive HAV methodologies
- Beyond the Fab: Building Europe’s Next Generation of Semiconductor Champions
- AI Semiconductor Design at 3nm and 2nm: Silicon-Proven IP
- Samsung Foundry and Cadence Expand Infrastructure and Physical AI Solution