Build or Buy? The Design Rules Remain the Same
The last time I visited the "build or buy" issue, a lot of small commercial engineering outfits were looking to the big companies for in-house support for their various products for the burgeoning wireless market.
With the technology and complexity of self-contained RF systems having advanced much in the past 15 years, I'm sure the major IC companies and module makers still get involved with the little guy but the details are usually sparse due to the nature of today's non-disclosure agreements. On the other hand, build-versus-buy is largely the same issue at university labs and applied-research houses, where performance isn't necessarily measured in commercial terms and where meeting tight timetables and cost budgets aren't always the biggest driving factors.
So what are the general design rules? I reckon they're largely unknown to the current crop of today's young engineers, but they are relatively simple and unchanged, albeit counter-intuitive.
To read the full article, click here
Related Semiconductor IP
- TSMC 7nm 0V75 / 0V9 ESD Local Clamp – Low Cap
- TSMC 65nm 3V3 ESD Local Clamp – Rad Hard
- TSMC 5nm 1V8, 1.2V and 0.9V ESD Local Protection – Low Cap
- TSMC 3nm 3V3 ESD Local Clamp
- TSMC 3nm 1V2 ESD Local Clamp – Low Capacitance
Related Blogs
- The Hidden Threat in Analog IC Migration: Why Electromigration rules can make or break your next tapeout
- Building Smarter, Faster: How Arm Compute Subsystems Accelerate the Future of Chip Design
- Analog Design and Layout Migration automation in the AI era
- Cadence at the TSMC OIP: Pioneering the Future of Semiconductor Design
Latest Blogs
- Beyond Trusted: What the NSA’s New Guidance Means for Hardware Security
- A scalable, shader-programmable vector graphics GPU core for low-power MCUs
- Navigating ISO 26262 Part 11: A Guide for Semiconductor Architects
- Embedded Security explained: Digital signatures
- Hardware security verification must go beyond functional testing