ARM Versus x86: Which Will Achieve Windows Success?
In the recently published "Microsoft Surface: Zune 2.0, or a return to past greatness?" I discussed Microsoft's recently announced mobile computers relative to both Windows 8-based platforms from historical Microsoft hardware partners, and to systems running alternative operating systems such as Apple's iOS and Mac OS X, and Google's Android and Chrome OS. At the end of it, I wrote:
As for the comparative success of the ARM- and x86-powered Surface variants, I have thoughts, too, but there's enough to discuss here to justify a blog post all its own, which I promise to publish in the near future.
That's where this particular writeup fits in.
To read the full article, click here
Related Semiconductor IP
- Ultra Ethernet MAC & PCS 100G/200G/400G/800G
- Ethernet PCS 100G/200G/400G/800G/1.6T
- Ethernet MAC 100G/200G/400G/800G/1.6T
- Junction Over-Temperature Detector with Linear Centigrade-to-Voltage Output - X-FAB XT018
- Performance P570 Gen 3
Related Blogs
- Microsoft responds to Windows on Arm developers with Build announcement
- Arm-based Cloud Instances Outperform x86 Instances by up to 64% on VP9 Encoding
- Windows on Arm is Ready for Prime Time: Native Chrome Caps Momentum for the Future of Laptop Computing
- TSMC Versus Global Foundries
Latest Blogs
- Inside the SiFive Performance™ P570 Gen 3: High Performance Efficiency for Next-Generation Consumer and Commercial Applications
- What the steam engine can teach us about modern chip design
- Automotive silicon in the era of AI, functional safety, and cybersecurity
- JPEG XS Officially Joins GenICam, The Machine Vision Standard Managed By EMVA
- Beyond PCIe Compliance: Why Stress Testing Is Crucial for Edge AI Deployments