ARM Versus x86: Which Will Achieve Windows Success?
In the recently published "Microsoft Surface: Zune 2.0, or a return to past greatness?" I discussed Microsoft's recently announced mobile computers relative to both Windows 8-based platforms from historical Microsoft hardware partners, and to systems running alternative operating systems such as Apple's iOS and Mac OS X, and Google's Android and Chrome OS. At the end of it, I wrote:
As for the comparative success of the ARM- and x86-powered Surface variants, I have thoughts, too, but there's enough to discuss here to justify a blog post all its own, which I promise to publish in the near future.
That's where this particular writeup fits in.
To read the full article, click here
Related Semiconductor IP
- Band-Gap Voltage Reference with dual 2µA Current Source - X-FAB XT018
- 250nA-88μA Current Reference - X-FAB XT018-0.18μm BCD-on-SOI CMOS
- UCIe D2D Adapter & PHY Integrated IP
- Low Dropout (LDO) Regulator
- 16-Bit xSPI PSRAM PHY
Related Blogs
- Microsoft responds to Windows on Arm developers with Build announcement
- Arm-based Cloud Instances Outperform x86 Instances by up to 64% on VP9 Encoding
- Windows on Arm is Ready for Prime Time: Native Chrome Caps Momentum for the Future of Laptop Computing
- TSMC Versus Global Foundries
Latest Blogs
- AI in Design Verification: Where It Works and Where It Doesn’t
- PCIe 7.0 fundamentals: Baseline ordering rules
- Ensuring reliability in Advanced IC design
- A Closer Look at proteanTecs Health and Performance Management Solutions Portfolio
- Enabling Memory Choice for Modern AI Systems: Tenstorrent and Rambus Deliver Flexible, Power-Efficient Solutions