Learn more about Single-Protocol PHY IP core
Enter the Multi-Protocol SerDes (Serializer/Deserializer)—a flexible, reusable IP block that allows a single PHY to support multiple serial communication protocols, such as PCIe, SATA, Ethernet, USB, and more. This approach enables SoC vendors to meet diverse customer requirements and application needs without redesigning I/O for each target market.
In today’s fast-paced SoC market, memory flexibility is no longer a luxury—it’s a competitive necessity. While DDR5 is gaining traction in high-performance systems, DDR3 and DDR4 remain dominant in embedded, industrial, and cost-sensitive markets. A combo DDR3/4 interface offers engineers a way to bridge these worlds, maximizing product reach while reducing design risk.
UniversalFlash Storage (UFS) was created for mobile applications and computer systems requiring high performance and low power consumption. These systems typically use embedded Flash based on the JEDEC standard eMMC. UFS was defined by JEDEC as the evolutionary replacement for eMMC offering significantly higher memory bandwidth. The standard builds on existing standards such as the SCSI command set, the MIPI Alliance M-PHY and UniPro as well as eMMC form factors to simplify adoption and development.
In this paper, we introduce a new high-level, dataflow programming language called C~ (“C flow”) that further increases productivity by raising the level of abstraction from behavioral descriptions, while overcoming the limitations of C for hardware design. We present the syntax and semantics of this language, and the framework that provides hardware and software code generation. This paper illustrates the benefits of using C~ for hardware design of a IEEE 802.3 MAC, synthesized for FPGA and for 90nm CMOS technology.
Universal Flash Storage (UFS) was created for mobile applications and computer systems requiring high performance and low power consumption. These systems typically use embedded Flash based on the JEDEC standard eMMC. UFS was defined by JEDEC as the evolutionary replacement for eMMC offering significantly higher memory bandwidth. The standard builds on existing standards such as the SCSI command set, the MIPI Alliance M-PHY and UniProSM as well as eMMC form factors to simplify adoption and development.
Since MIPI and MDDI standards both target interfaces to cameras and displays on mobile devices, are two separate standards really needed?
