Stacking up high-speed Bluetooth against Certified Wireless USB
By Dr. Mike Foley, Bluetooth SIG
March 25, 2007 -- wirelessnetdesignline.com
As ultra wideband (UWB) radio nears mass production, manufacturers and expert observers alike forecast a collision between the two major wireless protocols that will ride upon this new high-speed technology: high-speed Bluetooth wireless technology and Certified Wireless USB.
The emergence of Certified Wireless USB and high-speed Bluetooth technology, both using the same WiMedia UWB radio, has led many to assume that one technology will dominate across all types of devices and usage scenarios, much as earlier wireless technologies, such as Wi-Fi and even today's Bluetooth wireless technology, had once been hyped as the single solution for all wireless needs.
Bluetooth technology defied the original "one-size-fits-all" hype—and the pessimism that followed—by gaining traction in the market for which it was originally designed. Namely, mobile phones and the devices that connect to mobile phones.
Wi-Fi, too, established its own dominance in the market for which it was optimized: wireless local area networking between PCs and access points. While the marketplace did not satisfy observers' lust for decisive victory between Wi-Fi and Bluetooth technologies, it did sort out which technology is superior for each application.
Similarly, high-speed Bluetooth technology and Certified Wireless USB work best in different applications, and the marketplace will once again decide where each technology will land based on these technologies' core strengths.
March 25, 2007 -- wirelessnetdesignline.com
As ultra wideband (UWB) radio nears mass production, manufacturers and expert observers alike forecast a collision between the two major wireless protocols that will ride upon this new high-speed technology: high-speed Bluetooth wireless technology and Certified Wireless USB.
The emergence of Certified Wireless USB and high-speed Bluetooth technology, both using the same WiMedia UWB radio, has led many to assume that one technology will dominate across all types of devices and usage scenarios, much as earlier wireless technologies, such as Wi-Fi and even today's Bluetooth wireless technology, had once been hyped as the single solution for all wireless needs.
Bluetooth technology defied the original "one-size-fits-all" hype—and the pessimism that followed—by gaining traction in the market for which it was originally designed. Namely, mobile phones and the devices that connect to mobile phones.
Wi-Fi, too, established its own dominance in the market for which it was optimized: wireless local area networking between PCs and access points. While the marketplace did not satisfy observers' lust for decisive victory between Wi-Fi and Bluetooth technologies, it did sort out which technology is superior for each application.
Similarly, high-speed Bluetooth technology and Certified Wireless USB work best in different applications, and the marketplace will once again decide where each technology will land based on these technologies' core strengths.
To read the full article, click here
Related Semiconductor IP
- Bluetooth 5.4 LE Controller with Link Layer, optional 802.15.4 MAC, early access to Channel Sounding
- Bluetooth 5.3 LE Controller with Link Layer and optional 802.15.4 MAC
- Bluetooth 5.2 / 5.1 / 5.0 / 4.2 LE Controller with Link Layer and optional 802.15.4 MAC
- Controller, Modem, Software Stack and Profiles for Dual Mode Bluetooth v5.2 and v5.3
- LC3 / LC3plus Bluetooth LE Audio Codecs for Arm Cortex M4 & M33
Related Articles
- DSP hardware extensions speed up 3G wireless multimedia
- Favorable Economics Will Drive Rapid Adoption of Certified Wireless USB
- Implementing high Speed USB functionality with FPGA- and ASIC-based designs
- Wireless lan standard holds back Bluetooth
Latest Articles
- LACE: Large Language Model Aided Multi-Agent Framework for Agile RISC-V Instruction Extension
- A Process-Aware Hybrid Si/IGO Monolithic-3D 6T SRAM with BEOL Pass-Gates for the 2nm Node
- Automated Estimation of MBIST Area and Test Time in Heterogeneous Memory IPs via Stacked Ensemble Framework
- VIPER: Architecture-Aware Performance Modeling for Processing-in-Memory Design-Space Exploration
- CTTE: An Open Dual-Protocol RISC-V Trace Encoder for N-Trace and E-Trace