Letter to the editor: Foundry vs. IP (Les Wilson)
I received a plethora of e-mails regarding my recent article, entitled "Opinion: Semi IP sector is a lost cause"
Then, I asked for the IP vendors themselves to respond to a set of questions. Here's one letter to the editor:
Editor,
I agree that the silicon IP market is in a tragic state. I think the often cited quality issue is an out of date stereotype. I have witnessed plenty of high quality IPs.
The fundamentals of a business are in question here. Why are no new SIP companies forming? They cannot make a profit. The customers tend to think they are just hiring labor with no value add so they negotiate the IP company down to zero profit.
Only microprocessor core companies have leverage at this point, because they have established a brand (ARM, MIPS etc.) Most IP companies cannot charge a royalty so profit is pretty thin.
To read the full article, click here
Related Semiconductor IP
- Verification IP for C-PHY
- Band-Gap Voltage Reference with dual 2µA Current Source - X-FAB XT018
- 250nA-88μA Current Reference - X-FAB XT018-0.18μm BCD-on-SOI CMOS
- UCIe D2D Adapter & PHY Integrated IP
- Low Dropout (LDO) Regulator
Related News
- Letter to the editor: Patents a sore spot (Tuan Pham, EM Microelectronic Marin)
- Letter to the editor: IP pros, cons (Jonah Probell)
- Letter to the editor: Golf more fun than IP (Doug McKenney, LSI)
- Letter to the editor: DSPs for IP (Shaul Berger)
Latest News
- JEDEC Advances DDR5 MRDIMM Ecosystem with New Memory Interface Logic and Expanded MRDIMM Roadmap
- Altera Brings Determinism to Physical AI Systems with Latest Release of FPGA AI Suite
- Mosaic SoC raises $3.8M to bring real-time spatial intelligence to every consumer device
- UMC Reports First Quarter 2026 Results
- Rambus Appoints Sumeet Gagneja as Chief Financial Officer