IP Adventures in EDA
By Gabe Moretti, edadesignline.com
March 13, 2008
By their own actions in the last few weeks, Mentor, Magma, and Cadence, have reopened the debate on whether or not IP belongs in EDA. Their answers respectively are: no, yes, and "on my own terms".
It was about a year ago that Michael Santarini and I had the last of a number of discussions on the topic: Michael was against the idea and I was defending EDAC's decision to include IP revenues in their Market Statistics Summary Report. My argument was based on historical facts. Long before the concept of Fabless Semiconductor Company was invented, Synopsys began to sell IP blocks under the DesignWare brand. If I remember correctly it was 1990, but certainly no later than 1991. The blocks were simple compared to what is available now, and the primary reason for selling them was to give a hand to designers still struggling with logic synthesis. Design Compiler was a tool at times difficult to use, both because it was new and because designers had never created synthesizable logic before. Will EDAC continue to include the IP market in the report? I think it depends on Cadence: read on.
March 13, 2008
By their own actions in the last few weeks, Mentor, Magma, and Cadence, have reopened the debate on whether or not IP belongs in EDA. Their answers respectively are: no, yes, and "on my own terms".
It was about a year ago that Michael Santarini and I had the last of a number of discussions on the topic: Michael was against the idea and I was defending EDAC's decision to include IP revenues in their Market Statistics Summary Report. My argument was based on historical facts. Long before the concept of Fabless Semiconductor Company was invented, Synopsys began to sell IP blocks under the DesignWare brand. If I remember correctly it was 1990, but certainly no later than 1991. The blocks were simple compared to what is available now, and the primary reason for selling them was to give a hand to designers still struggling with logic synthesis. Design Compiler was a tool at times difficult to use, both because it was new and because designers had never created synthesizable logic before. Will EDAC continue to include the IP market in the report? I think it depends on Cadence: read on.
To read the full article, click here
Related Semiconductor IP
- Ultra-low jitter, low-power ring-oscillator-based PLL-3GHz-4GHz
- Image Warping IP
- Image Warping IP
- ML-KEM-X Post-Quantum Cryptography Core
- AXI5 to/from AXI4 Bridge
Related News
- Digital Blocks DB9000 Display Controller IP Core Family Extends Leadership in 8K, Automotive, Medical, Aerospace, and Industrial SoC Designs
- Arteris Network-on-Chip IP Deployed in Renesas’ Next-Gen R-Car Automotive Technology
- Silicon Creations Celebrates 20 Years of Global Growth and Leadership in 2nm IP Solutions
- Synopsys Partners with TSMC to Power Next-Generation AI Systems with Silicon Proven IP and Certified EDA Flows
Latest News
- ASYGN Revolutionizes Ultra-Low-Power Embedded AI with Its ColibryNPU Microcontroller
- Tampere University Joins OpenTitan Coalition to Advance RISC-V SoC Security and Open-Source Silicon Research
- Kandou AI to Open India Chip Design Headquarters in Hyderabad
- CAST Expands Functional Safety IP Line with ASIL B Ready SENT/SAE J2716 Receiver Core
- SkyeChip Advances Custom Interface IP Engagement with Cerebras for Wafer-Scale AI Platforms