IP Adventures in EDA
By Gabe Moretti, edadesignline.com
March 13, 2008
By their own actions in the last few weeks, Mentor, Magma, and Cadence, have reopened the debate on whether or not IP belongs in EDA. Their answers respectively are: no, yes, and "on my own terms".
It was about a year ago that Michael Santarini and I had the last of a number of discussions on the topic: Michael was against the idea and I was defending EDAC's decision to include IP revenues in their Market Statistics Summary Report. My argument was based on historical facts. Long before the concept of Fabless Semiconductor Company was invented, Synopsys began to sell IP blocks under the DesignWare brand. If I remember correctly it was 1990, but certainly no later than 1991. The blocks were simple compared to what is available now, and the primary reason for selling them was to give a hand to designers still struggling with logic synthesis. Design Compiler was a tool at times difficult to use, both because it was new and because designers had never created synthesizable logic before. Will EDAC continue to include the IP market in the report? I think it depends on Cadence: read on.
March 13, 2008
By their own actions in the last few weeks, Mentor, Magma, and Cadence, have reopened the debate on whether or not IP belongs in EDA. Their answers respectively are: no, yes, and "on my own terms".
It was about a year ago that Michael Santarini and I had the last of a number of discussions on the topic: Michael was against the idea and I was defending EDAC's decision to include IP revenues in their Market Statistics Summary Report. My argument was based on historical facts. Long before the concept of Fabless Semiconductor Company was invented, Synopsys began to sell IP blocks under the DesignWare brand. If I remember correctly it was 1990, but certainly no later than 1991. The blocks were simple compared to what is available now, and the primary reason for selling them was to give a hand to designers still struggling with logic synthesis. Design Compiler was a tool at times difficult to use, both because it was new and because designers had never created synthesizable logic before. Will EDAC continue to include the IP market in the report? I think it depends on Cadence: read on.
To read the full article, click here
Related Semiconductor IP
- UALink 200G v1.0 Verification IP
- CCSDS SCCC Demapper and Turbo Decoder
- NPU IP
- JPEG XL Encoder
- I2C Master/Slave Controller Core
Related News
- Arteris Network-on-Chip IP Deployed in Renesas’ Next-Gen R-Car Automotive Technology
- Silicon Creations Celebrates 20 Years of Global Growth and Leadership in 2nm IP Solutions
- Synopsys Partners with TSMC to Power Next-Generation AI Systems with Silicon Proven IP and Certified EDA Flows
- EXTOLL announces Availability of Industry's first 16G UCIe PHY IP in GlobalFoundries 22FDX/22FDX+ Ready for Customer Integration
Latest News
- At GAITA, PUFsecurity Shows How PUFrt and PUF-Based HSMs Give Agentic and Physical AI a Verifiable Root of Trust
- QuickLogic Secures Six-Figure eFPGA IP Contract for Automotive Industrial SoC
- Faraday Powers Intelligent Sensing with New 14nm MIPI C/D Combo PHY IP
- Cadence Wins Five 2026 TSMC OIP Partner of the Year Awards
- Lattice Delivers Industry-First PQC-Enabled Platform Firmware Resilience for AI Infrastructure with Lattice Sentry Solution Stack