IP Adventures in EDA
By Gabe Moretti, edadesignline.com
March 13, 2008
By their own actions in the last few weeks, Mentor, Magma, and Cadence, have reopened the debate on whether or not IP belongs in EDA. Their answers respectively are: no, yes, and "on my own terms".
It was about a year ago that Michael Santarini and I had the last of a number of discussions on the topic: Michael was against the idea and I was defending EDAC's decision to include IP revenues in their Market Statistics Summary Report. My argument was based on historical facts. Long before the concept of Fabless Semiconductor Company was invented, Synopsys began to sell IP blocks under the DesignWare brand. If I remember correctly it was 1990, but certainly no later than 1991. The blocks were simple compared to what is available now, and the primary reason for selling them was to give a hand to designers still struggling with logic synthesis. Design Compiler was a tool at times difficult to use, both because it was new and because designers had never created synthesizable logic before. Will EDAC continue to include the IP market in the report? I think it depends on Cadence: read on.
March 13, 2008
By their own actions in the last few weeks, Mentor, Magma, and Cadence, have reopened the debate on whether or not IP belongs in EDA. Their answers respectively are: no, yes, and "on my own terms".
It was about a year ago that Michael Santarini and I had the last of a number of discussions on the topic: Michael was against the idea and I was defending EDAC's decision to include IP revenues in their Market Statistics Summary Report. My argument was based on historical facts. Long before the concept of Fabless Semiconductor Company was invented, Synopsys began to sell IP blocks under the DesignWare brand. If I remember correctly it was 1990, but certainly no later than 1991. The blocks were simple compared to what is available now, and the primary reason for selling them was to give a hand to designers still struggling with logic synthesis. Design Compiler was a tool at times difficult to use, both because it was new and because designers had never created synthesizable logic before. Will EDAC continue to include the IP market in the report? I think it depends on Cadence: read on.
To read the full article, click here
Related Semiconductor IP
- Verification IP for C-PHY
- Band-Gap Voltage Reference with dual 2µA Current Source - X-FAB XT018
- 250nA-88μA Current Reference - X-FAB XT018-0.18μm BCD-on-SOI CMOS
- UCIe D2D Adapter & PHY Integrated IP
- Low Dropout (LDO) Regulator
Related News
- Analogue Insight IP Group Launches Analogue Insight SAFE in Portland, Oregon to Deliver Certification-Grade Security IP for Next-Gen SoCs and Chiplets
- Qualitas Semiconductor Expands Global Presence with 4nm UCIe and PCIe Gen 6.0 IP Licensing Agreement in the U.S. AI Market
- TTTECH releases 10 Gbit TSN-End Point IP Integration Kit to enable rapid TSN adoption in mission-critical applications
- Spectral Design and Test Inc. and BAE Systems Announce Collaboration in RHBD Memory IP Development
Latest News
- JEDEC Advances DDR5 MRDIMM Ecosystem with New Memory Interface Logic and Expanded MRDIMM Roadmap
- Altera Brings Determinism to Physical AI Systems with Latest Release of FPGA AI Suite
- Mosaic SoC raises $3.8M to bring real-time spatial intelligence to every consumer device
- UMC Reports First Quarter 2026 Results
- Rambus Appoints Sumeet Gagneja as Chief Financial Officer