Commentary: ANSI C won't work for ESL
Mike Meredith, Forte Design Systems
(05/10/2007 2:36 PM EDT), EE Times
While SystemC has been accepted by most systems, semiconductor, and EDA companies as the language of choice for high-speed system-level modeling, there is a continued debate over which language is best for electronic system level (ESL) synthesis.
Some prefer ANSI C or C++. They argue that the breadth of algorithmic software available in these languages and the large numbers of people familiar with them make them a natural fit for synthesizing hardware implementations from high-level algorithmic descriptions.
These arguments have some merit, and at first blush the prospect of re-using existing software source code for hardware implementation looks fast and easy. Unfortunately, hardware designers attempting this while continuing to meet the challenging power consumption, silicon area, and performance demands of today's high-volume consumer oriented systems-on-chip will encounter two intractable problems. Source code optimized for execution on a processor is unsuitable for direct hardware implementation, and C and C++ have a fundamental inability to express constructs that are necessary for effective hardware design.
(05/10/2007 2:36 PM EDT), EE Times
While SystemC has been accepted by most systems, semiconductor, and EDA companies as the language of choice for high-speed system-level modeling, there is a continued debate over which language is best for electronic system level (ESL) synthesis.
Some prefer ANSI C or C++. They argue that the breadth of algorithmic software available in these languages and the large numbers of people familiar with them make them a natural fit for synthesizing hardware implementations from high-level algorithmic descriptions.
These arguments have some merit, and at first blush the prospect of re-using existing software source code for hardware implementation looks fast and easy. Unfortunately, hardware designers attempting this while continuing to meet the challenging power consumption, silicon area, and performance demands of today's high-volume consumer oriented systems-on-chip will encounter two intractable problems. Source code optimized for execution on a processor is unsuitable for direct hardware implementation, and C and C++ have a fundamental inability to express constructs that are necessary for effective hardware design.
To read the full article, click here
Related Semiconductor IP
- GlobalFoundries 22nm 3V3 GPIO
- RDMA IP
- PCIe Controller
- USB Controller
- MTP (Multi-Time Programmable) IP
Related News
- ESL needs more work, panelists say
- Mentor Graphics Introduces Catapult SL, the First High-Level Synthesis Tool to Create High-Performance Subsystems from Pure ANSI C++
- Commentary: Why it's time to redefine ESL
- Commentary: ESL success demands outsourcing
Latest News
- Creonic Highlights SUSTAINET WP3.5 Results with Live Demonstration at Berlin 6G Conference
- AccelerComm Selected for ESA-Funded Contract Advancing Regenerative 5G Satellite Networks
- Inside Architect Labs’ Two-Week Chip Design
- Top 10 Global Fabless IC Design Houses Post 73% YoY Revenue Growth in 2Q26; AMD Breaks into Top Three
- Arasan furthers MIPI I3C® compliance with its participation at the I3C® interop in Taipei