Second Source The x86? No Thanks
October 6, 2014
There was a time when Intel couldn’t give away rights to make the x86. National Semiconductor turned down the offer to second source the processor.
“I was on a skiing vacation with my family when I got a telephone call from Andy Grove at Intel,” recalls Charlie Sporck, CEO of National, in his book SPINOFF, “Andy said microprocessor sales were so strong that Intel needed a second source.
To read the full article, click here
Related Semiconductor IP
- MIL-STD-1553 Controller IP
- UFS 5.x Device IP
- UCIe 3.x Controller IP
- Ethernet 800G PCS IP
- CHI to UCIe Bridge IP
Related Blogs
- UMC Wins Qualcomm 28nm Second Source Contract!
- Sun's x86 Clone
- Source of IP: Silicon foundries provides 18% of Design IP blocks, IP vendors only 16% to Fabless
- Jeff Bier's Impulse Response - Open Source Digital Signal Processing?
Latest Blogs
- CDM Dependence on Device Capacitance
- What the Cyber Resilience Act means for the future of chip design
- When Your IP Vendor Has Operated 150,000 Base Stations: Introducing Viettel Semiconductor
- Relationship between architecture and validation in system design
- The Post-Quantum Cryptography Mandate: Building Cryptographically Agile Systems for the Quantum Era