Intel's Real Failure
January 9, 2013
Intel's problem isn't its failure to get into mobile but its failure to crank up its PC microprocessors, argues Linley Gwennap in Microprocessor Report.
Gwennap points out that 2012 is the third of four years in which PC growth has been under 4%.
He also points out that: "Intel's fastest Core i7 desktop processor went from a 2.93GHz quad core in 2009 to 3.5GHz quad core in 2012."
To read the full article, click here
Related Semiconductor IP
- nQrux Secure Boot
- 4K/8K Multiformat IP supporting AV2 decoder
- Ultra Ethernet MAC & PCS 100G/200G/400G/800G
- Ethernet PCS 100G/200G/400G/800G/1.6T
- Ethernet MAC 100G/200G/400G/800G/1.6T
Related Blogs
- The real race for superiority is TSMC vs Intel
- Intel Really is Delaying 14nm Move-in. 450mm is Slipping Too. EUV, who knows?
- Yes, Intel 14nm Really is Delayed...And They Lost $600M on Mobile
- IP integration: Is it the real system-level design?
Latest Blogs
- A Repeatable Framework for Hardware Security Assurance
- Inside the SiFive Performance™ P570 Gen 3: High Performance Efficiency for Next-Generation Consumer and Commercial Applications
- What the steam engine can teach us about modern chip design
- Automotive silicon in the era of AI, functional safety, and cybersecurity
- JPEG XS Officially Joins GenICam, The Machine Vision Standard Managed By EMVA