Separating Fact from Fiction: The Impact of Android Anti-fragmentation on the Processor Landscape
April 1, 2011
Rumors, misinformation and speculation are spreading like wildfire across the industry today following recent reports about Android anti-fragmentation efforts and what this means for processor architecture openness. Will Google’s anti-fragmentation initiatives for Android code impact providers of microprocessor architectures such as MIPS, Intel and ARM? Does anti-fragmentation mean that Google is standardizing Android for any specific architecture? As someone who has been deeply involved with MIPS’ Android efforts, here’s my take on separating some of the fact from fiction.
Related Semiconductor IP
- Band-Gap Voltage Reference with dual 2µA Current Source - X-FAB XT018
- 250nA-88μA Current Reference - X-FAB XT018-0.18μm BCD-on-SOI CMOS
- UCIe D2D Adapter & PHY Integrated IP
- Low Dropout (LDO) Regulator
- 16-Bit xSPI PSRAM PHY
Related Blogs
- Android Outsells iPhones, Opens Processor Market
- Navigating the Future of EDA: The Transformative Impact of AI and ML
- Enhancing Edge AI with the Newest Class of Processor: Tensilica NeuroEdge 130 AICP
- The Role of GPU in AI: Tech Impact & Imagination Technologies
Latest Blogs
- AI in Design Verification: Where It Works and Where It Doesn’t
- PCIe 7.0 fundamentals: Baseline ordering rules
- Ensuring reliability in Advanced IC design
- A Closer Look at proteanTecs Health and Performance Management Solutions Portfolio
- Enabling Memory Choice for Modern AI Systems: Tenstorrent and Rambus Deliver Flexible, Power-Efficient Solutions