The Increasingly Hazardous World of FPGA Verification
October 26, 2010
Last week saw the publication of two interesting blog posts regarding the growing challenges of FPGA verification, first from my buddy Dave Orecchio over at GateRocket and then from my Cadence colleague Steve Leibson. Both posts made the point that FPGA developers are increasingly facing the same verification issues as developers of non-programmable devices. This trend has been evident for quite a few years, but the number of FPGA users affected has grown from a tiny fraction to an entire upper tier of developers whose design size and complexity rival or even surpass many ASIC and SoC projects.
To read the full article, click here
Related Semiconductor IP
- Band-Gap Voltage Reference with dual 2µA Current Source - X-FAB XT018
- 250nA-88μA Current Reference - X-FAB XT018-0.18μm BCD-on-SOI CMOS
- UCIe D2D Adapter & PHY Integrated IP
- Low Dropout (LDO) Regulator
- 16-Bit xSPI PSRAM PHY
Related Blogs
- The interface makes the FPGA
- Altera's intros 28nm Stratix V FPGA family
- Xilinx unleashes triad of low-power, 28nm FPGA families with very promising characteristics for memory interfacing
- Will verification challenges overwhelm FPGA design?
Latest Blogs
- AI in Design Verification: Where It Works and Where It Doesn’t
- PCIe 7.0 fundamentals: Baseline ordering rules
- Ensuring reliability in Advanced IC design
- A Closer Look at proteanTecs Health and Performance Management Solutions Portfolio
- Enabling Memory Choice for Modern AI Systems: Tenstorrent and Rambus Deliver Flexible, Power-Efficient Solutions