"Cook's Law" supersedes "Moore's Law"-its impact on Apple, Samsung, TSMC & Intel
Apple drives the semi industry harder than Wintel ever did: Is winning Apple's chip business a pyrrhic victory? Is 14nm done before it starts? Too short to be profitable?
Chips marching to an Apple cadence...
In the "old days" when Wintel ruled the roost and drove the semi industry, it was driving spending cycles based on new versions of Windows that stimulated unit volume of PCs and thus chips.
New versions of Windows did not specifically demand nor require new technology nodes of Intel processors which were released at the standard "Moore's Law " cadence. Windows releases and Intel technology nodes were not interdependent and were relatively loosely linked. It was a "nice to have" if new processors came out at the same time as a new version of Windows but it wasn't a "must have"
To read the full article, click here
Related Semiconductor IP
- TSMC 7nm 0V75 / 0V9 ESD Local Clamp – Low Cap
- TSMC 65nm 3V3 ESD Local Clamp – Rad Hard
- TSMC 5nm 1V8, 1.2V and 0.9V ESD Local Protection – Low Cap
- TSMC 3nm 3V3 ESD Local Clamp
- TSMC 3nm 1V2 ESD Local Clamp – Low Capacitance
Related Blogs
- Moore’s Law and 40nm Yield
- Moore's Law and 28nm Yield
- Moore's (Empirical Observation) Law!
- Intel says Moore's Law alive and well and living at 32nm
Latest Blogs
- Beyond Trusted: What the NSA’s New Guidance Means for Hardware Security
- A scalable, shader-programmable vector graphics GPU core for low-power MCUs
- Navigating ISO 26262 Part 11: A Guide for Semiconductor Architects
- Embedded Security explained: Digital signatures
- Hardware security verification must go beyond functional testing