Analog Design vs. Automation -- Why Are They At Odds?
August 18, 2010
Back in 2002 and 2003 there was a lot of talk about analog synthesis being the "next new thing" to close the productivity gap between analog and digital designers. Well, I hope you didn't hold your breath for this!
That promise failed mostly because analog design was still a custom design challenge, relying on innovation to provide differentiation in the final application. Standardizing analog design, or constraining the design to a fixed set of rules, never worked in reality, and innovation was squashed in the process.
To read the full article, click here
Related Semiconductor IP
- Mesochronous Bridge for PCIe/CXL
- AI-native GPU
- OpenGMSL Verification IP
- OpenGMSL Leaf IP
- FlexGen Multi-Die Smart Network-on-Chip (NoC) IP
Related Blogs
- Analog Design and Layout Migration automation in the AI era
- Analog design automation: Pipe dream or inevitability?
- Showcasing AI-Driven Analog Design Migration at Samsung SAFE Forum
- Wi-Fi 7 (IEEE 802.11be) & MLO vs. Wi-Fi 6/6E (IEEE 802.11ax): What to Ask for Optimal Design Considerations
Latest Blogs
- Automated, Faster Specification to Sign-Off with IDS-AI
- NovaTech Automation Crius PIU: Bringing Conventional Instrument Transformers onto the IEC 61850 Process Bus
- Single Pair Ethernet and TSN: The In-Robot Network Behind the Next Humanoid Robots
- A design path to success exists for ultra-low-voltage SoCs
- Where Routine Flow Ends Veriest Formal Expertise Begins