Analog Design vs. Automation -- Why Are They At Odds?
August 18, 2010
Back in 2002 and 2003 there was a lot of talk about analog synthesis being the "next new thing" to close the productivity gap between analog and digital designers. Well, I hope you didn't hold your breath for this!
That promise failed mostly because analog design was still a custom design challenge, relying on innovation to provide differentiation in the final application. Standardizing analog design, or constraining the design to a fixed set of rules, never worked in reality, and innovation was squashed in the process.
To read the full article, click here
Related Semiconductor IP
- Ultra Ethernet MAC & PCS 100G/200G/400G/800G
- Ethernet PCS 100G/200G/400G/800G/1.6T
- Ethernet MAC 100G/200G/400G/800G/1.6T
- Junction Over-Temperature Detector with Linear Centigrade-to-Voltage Output - X-FAB XT018
- Performance P570 Gen 3
Related Blogs
- Analog Design and Layout Migration automation in the AI era
- Analog design automation: Pipe dream or inevitability?
- Showcasing AI-Driven Analog Design Migration at Samsung SAFE Forum
- Wi-Fi 7 (IEEE 802.11be) & MLO vs. Wi-Fi 6/6E (IEEE 802.11ax): What to Ask for Optimal Design Considerations
Latest Blogs
- Inside the SiFive Performance™ P570 Gen 3: High Performance Efficiency for Next-Generation Consumer and Commercial Applications
- What the steam engine can teach us about modern chip design
- Automotive silicon in the era of AI, functional safety, and cybersecurity
- JPEG XS Officially Joins GenICam, The Machine Vision Standard Managed By EMVA
- Beyond PCIe Compliance: Why Stress Testing Is Crucial for Edge AI Deployments