Comment: A skeptic's view of the Microchip/Atmel merger
Bernie Cole
EE Times (10/03/2008 7:53 PM EDT)
Based on watching electronics companies try to merge and manage two different product lines over the years, I don't think Microchip's plans for supporting combined 8/16- and 32-bit MCU product lines, if its attempted acquisition of Atmel succeeds, is realistic.
History suggests that a company with two 8/16-bit microcontroller architectures and at least two different 32-bit CPU architectures will not survive very long. One of three outcomes is likely: the company will crash and burn in the effort, one or the other architecture will go into the dustbin of history, or the company will sell off one of them, the way Microchip plans to sell Atmel's nonvolatile memory and RF and automotive businesses to On Semiconductor.
A look at the industry's history reveals that trying to support more than one architecture just does not work. In the recent past, Intel Corp. was juggling three different architectures, targeting three different markets: the DEC StrongARM-derived PXA2xx targeting mobile and consumer designs, the IXP4xx family of network processors it also acquired from DEC, and the X86 architecture targeted at desktops, laptops and servers. What we have now is a single architecture from Intel, targeting all these segments.
EE Times (10/03/2008 7:53 PM EDT)
Based on watching electronics companies try to merge and manage two different product lines over the years, I don't think Microchip's plans for supporting combined 8/16- and 32-bit MCU product lines, if its attempted acquisition of Atmel succeeds, is realistic.
History suggests that a company with two 8/16-bit microcontroller architectures and at least two different 32-bit CPU architectures will not survive very long. One of three outcomes is likely: the company will crash and burn in the effort, one or the other architecture will go into the dustbin of history, or the company will sell off one of them, the way Microchip plans to sell Atmel's nonvolatile memory and RF and automotive businesses to On Semiconductor.
A look at the industry's history reveals that trying to support more than one architecture just does not work. In the recent past, Intel Corp. was juggling three different architectures, targeting three different markets: the DEC StrongARM-derived PXA2xx targeting mobile and consumer designs, the IXP4xx family of network processors it also acquired from DEC, and the X86 architecture targeted at desktops, laptops and servers. What we have now is a single architecture from Intel, targeting all these segments.
To read the full article, click here
Related Semiconductor IP
- Chiplet Die-to-Die Interconnect IP Solution
- High speed MACsec Engine 100G/200G/400G/800G/1.6T
- Temperature/Voltage sensors
- AMBA Bus Host to eSPI Controller/Target
- AMBA Bus Host to eSPI Controller
Related News
- SMSC Stockholders Approve Merger with Microchip
- Microchip Technology To Acquire Atmel
- Microchip's Sanghi: Why we want Atmel
- Microchip develops new flash technology to cut cost of re-programmable MCUs
Latest News
- Alliance for Open Media Releases AV2 Codec, Advancing Next-Generation Open Video Coding
- VeriSilicon Drives Commercial Adoption of AV2 Across Next-Generation Video and Streaming Applications
- Cadence Announces Collaboration with Intel Foundry to Accelerate Intel 14A Process Optimization for HPC and Mobile Designs
- Menta and Presto Engineering Announce Strategic Collaboration to Accelerate Adaptive ASIC Architectures with Embedded FPGA Technology
- MIPI A-PHY To Power Industry’s First Four-Company Automotive SerDes Interoperability Demonstration at AutoSens USA