Why do we need 450mm wafers?
May 2, 2013
This is a question often asked by journalists and others not directly involved in 450mm technology, and indeed was one of the questions that formed the basis of the SMART 2010/062 report Future Horizons produced for the European Commission.
It is also a question every new 450mm project has to answer in its funding request to the European Commission, and whilst working on the Bridge450 submission we realised the arguments have become rather unclear over time. The following gives some insight and clarity into the question.
To read the full article, click here
Related Semiconductor IP
- Ultra Ethernet MAC & PCS 100G/200G/400G/800G
- Ethernet PCS 100G/200G/400G/800G/1.6T
- Ethernet MAC 100G/200G/400G/800G/1.6T
- Junction Over-Temperature Detector with Linear Centigrade-to-Voltage Output - X-FAB XT018
- Performance P570 Gen 3
Related Blogs
- Do we need a new FPGA structure for prototyping?
- IP integration: what standards do we need?
- Do We Need Fab?
- Why the HMAC did we do this?
Latest Blogs
- Inside the SiFive Performance™ P570 Gen 3: High Performance Efficiency for Next-Generation Consumer and Commercial Applications
- What the steam engine can teach us about modern chip design
- Automotive silicon in the era of AI, functional safety, and cybersecurity
- JPEG XS Officially Joins GenICam, The Machine Vision Standard Managed By EMVA
- Beyond PCIe Compliance: Why Stress Testing Is Crucial for Edge AI Deployments