TSMC versus Intel at 20nm!
The biggest news out of the TSMC Symposium last week was the 20nm update. Lots of debate and speculation, just why is TSMC releasing one version of 20nm (20nm SoC) versus multiple versions like in 40nm (LP, G, LPG) and 28nm (HP, HPM, HPL, LP)? Here are my thoughts, I would also be interested in your feedback in the comment section. This really is a big change for both TSMC and the foundry business so it is certainly worth discussing.
Morris Chang did a candid interview in early January discussing Intel as a competitor. Morris is a very clever man, a master at the card game bridge, so you can really read a lot into of what he has said here:
To read the full article, click here
Related Semiconductor IP
- MIPI C‑PHY/D‑PHY IP on TSMC N2P
- Ultra-Low Latency 32Gbps SerDes IP in TSMC 12nm FFC
- Ultra-Low Latency 32Gbps SerDes IP in TSMC 22nm ULP
- 32Gbps SerDes IP in TSMC 12nm FFC
- 32Gbps SerDes IP in TSMC 22nm ULP
Related Blogs
- Intel Versus TSMC 14nm Processes
- IEDM 2017 - Intel Versus GLOBALFOUNDRIES at the Leading Edge
- NVIDIA Claims TSMC 20nm will not Scale?
- TSMC To Tape-Out 20nm Apple Processor This Month
Latest Blogs
- CDM Dependence on Device Capacitance
- What the Cyber Resilience Act means for the future of chip design
- When Your IP Vendor Has Operated 150,000 Base Stations: Introducing Viettel Semiconductor
- Relationship between architecture and validation in system design
- The Post-Quantum Cryptography Mandate: Building Cryptographically Agile Systems for the Quantum Era