The Semiconductor World vs TSMC vs EDA
September 3, 2009
In my previous blog on the EDA CEO panel at #46DAC, I was very disappointed to hear some of the smartest men in our industry agree that the only way to increase semiconductor design enablement (EDA) revenues is to increase overall semiconductor revenues. Talk about a complete lack of respect for the innovative people who support them, when in fact executives like themselves, and even themselves, continue to minimize this industry through irresponsible pricing practices (Smorgasbored Pricing), thoughtless litigation (CDNS vs AVNT, MENT vs CDNS, SNPS vs LAVA), and egocentric behavior, which results in a colossal failure of common sense.
Related Semiconductor IP
- MIL-STD-1553 Controller IP
- UFS 5.x Device IP
- UCIe 3.x Controller IP
- Ethernet 800G PCS IP
- CHI to UCIe Bridge IP
Related Blogs
- Special Report: Buying And Selling EDA Companies
- TSMC on Semiconductor IP Quality
- EDA: Not Like Semiconductor Equipment
- Semiconductor, EDA Industries Maturing? Wally Disagrees
Latest Blogs
- CDM Dependence on Device Capacitance
- What the Cyber Resilience Act means for the future of chip design
- When Your IP Vendor Has Operated 150,000 Base Stations: Introducing Viettel Semiconductor
- Relationship between architecture and validation in system design
- The Post-Quantum Cryptography Mandate: Building Cryptographically Agile Systems for the Quantum Era