When Considering Processor PPA, Don't Forget the Instruction Memory
The area of any part of a design contributes both to the silicon cost and to the power consumption. A simplistic following of the “A” in a processor IP vendor’s PPA numbers can be misleading. A processor is never in isolation but is part of a subsystem additionally including instruction memory, data memory, and peripherals. In most cases, instruction memory will be dominant and the processor area much less important.
The size of the instruction memory will be influenced by the target instruction set, the compiler and the compiler switches used. In the case of RISC-V, the choice of optional standard extensions and custom extensions can greatly influence the codesize.
To read the full article, click here
Related Semiconductor IP
- RISC-V Display Connectivity Subsystem (DCS)
- RISC-V IOPMP IP
- RISC-V Debug & Trace IP
- Gen#2 of 64-bit RISC-V core with out-of-order pipeline based complex
- 64-bit RISC-V core with in-order single issue pipeline. Tiny Linux-capable processor for IoT applications.
Related Blogs
- what made Apple design the A4 processor?
- Android Outsells iPhones, Opens Processor Market
- Specialty semiconductor foundry TowerJazz licenses "Y-Flash" IP to "leading" digital foundry
- ARM's Cortex-A15: A big step up for the ARM processor architecture. Targeting 32nm and 28nm technology nodes
Latest Blogs
- Relationship between architecture and validation in system design
- The Post-Quantum Cryptography Mandate: Building Cryptographically Agile Systems for the Quantum Era
- Demystify Address Translation Services (ATS) in PCIe 6.0
- Addressing DV Professionals’ Need to Reduce Verification Errors in Complex Designs
- Ethernet Auto-Negotiation: Enabling Seamless Link Optimization