When Considering Processor PPA, Don't Forget the Instruction Memory
November 12, 2020
The area of any part of a design contributes both to the silicon cost and to the power consumption. A simplistic following of the “A” in a processor IP vendor’s PPA numbers can be misleading. A processor is never in isolation but is part of a subsystem additionally including instruction memory, data memory, and peripherals. In most cases, instruction memory will be dominant and the processor area much less important.
The size of the instruction memory will be influenced by the target instruction set, the compiler and the compiler switches used. In the case of RISC-V, the choice of optional standard extensions and custom extensions can greatly influence the codesize.
To read the full article, click here
Related Semiconductor IP
- RISC-V Display Connectivity Subsystem (DCS)
- RISC-V IOPMP IP
- RISC-V Debug & Trace IP
- Gen#2 of 64-bit RISC-V core with out-of-order pipeline based complex
- 64-bit RISC-V core with in-order single issue pipeline. Tiny Linux-capable processor for IoT applications.
Related Blogs
- what made Apple design the A4 processor?
- Android Outsells iPhones, Opens Processor Market
- DRAM vendors look to 40nm process technology to keep DRAM profits flowing next year
- Anti-Fuse Memory With Gusto
Latest Blogs
- Would custom memory ease your SoC design?
- Embedded Security explained: Advanced Encryption Standard (AES)
- Cadence Demonstrates PCIe 8.0 PHY at PCI-SIG DevCon 2026
- Cadence Achieves Successful Silicon Validation of 1st IP Test Chips on Intel 18A
- From Classical CAN and CAN FD to CAN XL: Functional Safety and Security for Next-Generation In-Vehicle Communication