Designing Electrostatic Discharge (ESD) Protection for Monolithic SoCs and Multi-Die Systems
Did you know that over 30% of semiconductor failures are attributed to electrostatic discharge (ESD)? Defined by the ESD Association as “the rapid, spontaneous transfer of electrostatic charge induced by a high electrostatic field,” ESD causes equipment malfunction by disrupting the normal operations of electronic systems. ESD-induced damage ranges from leakages and shorts to junction and metallization burnouts, gate oxide ruptures, and resistor-metal interface deterioration. Real-world examples of ESD-induced chip failures could include a smartphone that delivers electric shocks, a fitness tracker with a blinking screen, or a malfunctioning automatic emergency braking system.
To minimize ESD vulnerabilities, semiconductor companies integrate protective devices or circuits into their silicon. Essentially, these components prevent internal circuitry—and the protective elements themselves—from incurring damage during an ESD event by creating low-resistivity discharge current paths. Although protective elements are effective when properly implemented, designing ESD-resistant silicon on the latest process nodes is increasingly challenging. Indeed, engineers pack billions of circuits into dense monolithic systems-on-chip (SoCs), leaving only limited area for protective ESD elements that must be meticulously placed and verified. Moreover, multi-die systems introduce a slew of new ESD vulnerabilities via complex thermal and electrical interactions between processors, memories, and interconnects.
Read on to learn how evolving ESD challenges are spurring semiconductor companies to augment conventional static checkers with a new generation of full-chip design tools that rapidly analyze silicon and simulate millions of transient ESD surges.
To read the full article, click here
Related Semiconductor IP
- MIL-STD-1553 Controller IP
- UFS 5.x Device IP
- UCIe 3.x Controller IP
- Ethernet 800G PCS IP
- CHI to UCIe Bridge IP
Related Blogs
- ESD Protection for an High Voltage Tolerant Driver Circuit in 4nm FinFET Technology
- Embedded Security explained: IPsec and IKEv2 for embedded Systems
- The Architectural Evolution of 16GHz PLLs for Next-Gen AI and SerDes SoCs
- Area, Pipelining, Integration: A Comparison of SHA-2 and SHA-3 for embedded Systems.
Latest Blogs
- CDM Dependence on Device Capacitance
- What the Cyber Resilience Act means for the future of chip design
- When Your IP Vendor Has Operated 150,000 Base Stations: Introducing Viettel Semiconductor
- Relationship between architecture and validation in system design
- The Post-Quantum Cryptography Mandate: Building Cryptographically Agile Systems for the Quantum Era