Vendor: NTLab Category: PLL

Phase-locked loop system 2.8 to 3.3 GHz

PLL is an automatic control system adjusting controlled oscillator frequency to be equal to reference oscillator frequency multip…

SMIC 180nm G Silicon Proven View all specifications

Overview

PLL is an automatic control system adjusting controlled oscillator frequency to be equal to reference oscillator frequency multiplied by a given integer. Frequency adjustment is carried out by using negative feedback. A phase detector compares a controlled oscillator output with a reference signal. The result is a charge pump current output that supplies external feedback filter and converted to a voltage for controlled oscillator adjustment.
Clock divider is used to generate signals with specified frequency. Delta-sigma modulator makes it possible to operate with reference oscillator of different frequency.
The block is fabricated on SMIC CMOS 0.18 um technology.

Key features

  • SMIC CMOS 0.18 um
  • Wide frequency range (2.8…3.3 GHz)
  • Built-in switched capacitors sections for VCO frequency adjustment
  • Low noise figure
  • High lock detector accuracy
  • Charge pump low output current disbalance
  • Low current consumption
  • Low power consumption
  • No external components required
  • Portable to other technologies (upon request)

Block Diagram

Applications

  • Portable transmitters
  • Portable transceiver

What’s Included?

  • Schematic or NetList
  • Abstract model (.lef and .lib files)
  • Layout view (optional)
  • Behavioral model (Verilog)
  • Extracted view (optional)
  • GDSII
  • DRC, LVS, antenna report
  • Test bench with saved configurations (optional)
  • Documentation

Silicon Options

Foundry Node Process Maturity
SMIC 180nm G Silicon Proven

Specifications

Identity

Part Number
180SMIC_PLL_02
Vendor
NTLab
Type
Silicon IP

Files

Note: some files may require an NDA depending on provider policy.

Provider

HQ: Lithuania

Learn more about PLL IP core

Creating a Frequency Plan for a System using a PLL

How do you ensure that every part of a system receives the clock it needs—without wasting power or sacrificing performance? The answer lies in creating a well-structured frequency plan built around a PLL.

Specifying a PLL Part 3: Jitter Budgeting for Synthesis

This white paper is aimed at system architects and physical implementation leaders working on the design of SoCs. It can be confusing to understand the impact of different jitter sources and how to calculate a jitter budget when specifying a digital system. This white paper explains how jitter changes the period of a clock and how to ensure that jitter has correctly been accounted for in the calculations for timing closure.

Specifying a PLL Part 2: Jitter Basics

This article explains a some of the key terminology and parameters commonly used to describe jitter. It will also help clarify the most important parameters for a some PLL applications, allowing the designer to better understand what is required from a PLL.

Specifying a PLL Part 1: Calculating PLL Clock Spur Requirements from ADC or DAC SFDR

In high end RF systems, such as 5G radios, the requirements are so stringent that the source of this strongest unwanted tone can be the PLL. This article outlines how spurs in the input clock to the ADC or DAC may limit the SFDR. This in turn will set the requirements for the spurs for the input clock (from a PLL), in order to achieve a specific SFDR.

Achieving Groundbreaking Performance with a Digital PLL

This article compares analog, first-generation digital, and second-generation digital PLLs. It evaluates which type of PLL may be best in which situation. It further discloses a roadmap into other application areas, including general purpose / logic clocking, and regular low-jitter PLLs.

Frequently asked questions about PLL IP cores

What is Phase-locked loop system 2.8 to 3.3 GHz?

Phase-locked loop system 2.8 to 3.3 GHz is a PLL IP core from NTLab listed on Semi IP Hub. It is listed with support for smic Silicon Proven.

How should engineers evaluate this PLL?

Engineers should review the overview, key features, supported foundries and nodes, maturity, deliverables, and provider information before shortlisting this PLL IP.

Can this semiconductor IP be compared with similar products?

Yes. Buyers can compare this product with similar semiconductor IP cores or IP families based on category, provider, process options, and structured technical specifications.

×
Semiconductor IP