Scenario Coverage In Formal Verification
A rapid increase in complexity with heterogeneous assemblies and advanced-node chips is raising all sorts of questions on the formal verification side about the completeness of coverage. Engineers may assume proofs are complete, but in many cases they're black boxes that provide little or no insights into what's actually being proven. This is where scenario coverage comes into play. Ashish Darbari, CEO of Axiomise, talks with Semiconductor Engineering about the need for quantitative metrics and qualitative completeness, showing which stimuli are reachable, whether the overall intent of the design is properly expressed — and equally important, which scenarios were not proven.
Related Semiconductor IP
- DFI 6.0 Verification IP
- TSMC 7nm 0V75 / 0V9 ESD Local Clamp – Low Cap
- TSMC 65nm 3V3 ESD Local Clamp – Rad Hard
- TSMC 5nm 1V8, 1.2V and 0.9V ESD Local Protection – Low Cap
- TSMC 3nm 3V3 ESD Local Clamp
Related Videos
- Scaling Performance In AI Systems
- Using Formal For RISC-V Security
- Cadence’s Silicon Proven UCIe IP in TSMC 3nm
- Livelocks And Deadlocks In NoCs