Encryption: Why Backdoors Are a Bad Idea
I have always had a passing interest in encryption and security. My PhD is on network file systems, where managing who has access to what data is an important aspect. I also spent the best part of a year working for a biometric security company (fingerprints and one-time-passcodes).
When Practical Cryptography by Bruce Schneier first came out, I immediately purchased a copy, at least partially because in that era it seemed plausible that the government might try to restrict knowledge of cryptography. It has never liked the idea that people might be able to talk without the government being able to listen, and it still doesn't. I think back then encryption software was still regarded as a "munition" and subject to full-on export regulation.
But the Internet came along and we all use cryptography every day, although it is hidden from us in our web browsers and our smartphones.
To read the full article, click here
Related Semiconductor IP
- Stealth AES Encryption IP
- G.9961 AES-CCM Frame Encryption Core
- AXI2AXI encryption bridge
- AES-GCM, Extreme-Speed IP Cores for AES256-GCM Authenticated Encryption
- AES-CTR Encryption Core
Related Blogs
- Power, Not Area: Why Edge GPU Design Is Entering a New Era
- Semiconductor Design Firms are Embracing the Public Cloud. Here are 5 Reasons Why.
- Chris Browy of Avery Design Sits Down to Discuss Why Silvaco and Avery are Working Together
- Why Embedded MRAMs Are the Future for Advanced-Node SoCs
Latest Blogs
- From Bug Hunting to Engineering Methodology: Lessons from AI-Driven Development
- Manufacturing Intelligence: Turning EDA Data into Trusted Action
- Execute-in-Place: Getting More from Embedded NVM
- Rethinking RTL flows with AI-driven hybrid formal verification
- Arm and NVIDIA: Building the trusted compute foundation for the agentic AI era