Choosing a Low-Risk FPGA/eFPGA Supplier
When system design engineers evaluate the risks of choosing a particular supplier for FPGAs and eFPGAs, they often focus on traditional concerns such as supply chain issues, quality, and reliability. While these are certainly critical considerations, there are other, more subtle risks that are often overlooked but equally important. Let’s explore a few of these key risks:
Longevity of Supply
Close to 75% of the FPGA/eFPGA companies that have been founded over the past four decades have either been acquired or are no longer in business. First and foremost, the FPGA and/or eFPGA Company you commit your project’s success needs to have the track record and financial wherewithal to be there every step of the way – in some cases for decades into the future.
Vendor Tool “Lock-In”
Most FPGA suppliers offer proprietary toolsets that only support their own devices. This can seem fine—until you discover that your targeted device is more expensive than expected, doesn’t meet timing or power requirements, or lacks the right mix of features for your design.
To read the full article, click here
Related Semiconductor IP
- eFPGA IP — Flexible Reconfigurable Logic Acceleration Core
- Radiation-Hardened eFPGA
- eFPGA Hard IP Generator
- eFPGA Soft IP
- eFPGA on GlobalFoundries GF12LPP
Related Blogs
- Case Study: Choosing the Right Benchmarks for the Job
- Case Study: Choosing the Right Benchmarks for the Job
- A Simple Method for Choosing a Chip Design Company
- How Innosilicon makes Fantasy a reality
Latest Blogs
- From Bug Hunting to Engineering Methodology: Lessons from AI-Driven Development
- Manufacturing Intelligence: Turning EDA Data into Trusted Action
- Execute-in-Place: Getting More from Embedded NVM
- Rethinking RTL flows with AI-driven hybrid formal verification
- Arm and NVIDIA: Building the trusted compute foundation for the agentic AI era