Choosing a Low-Risk FPGA/eFPGA Supplier
When system design engineers evaluate the risks of choosing a particular supplier for FPGAs and eFPGAs, they often focus on traditional concerns such as supply chain issues, quality, and reliability. While these are certainly critical considerations, there are other, more subtle risks that are often overlooked but equally important. Let’s explore a few of these key risks:
Longevity of Supply
Close to 75% of the FPGA/eFPGA companies that have been founded over the past four decades have either been acquired or are no longer in business. First and foremost, the FPGA and/or eFPGA Company you commit your project’s success needs to have the track record and financial wherewithal to be there every step of the way – in some cases for decades into the future.
Vendor Tool “Lock-In”
Most FPGA suppliers offer proprietary toolsets that only support their own devices. This can seem fine—until you discover that your targeted device is more expensive than expected, doesn’t meet timing or power requirements, or lacks the right mix of features for your design.
To read the full article, click here
Related Semiconductor IP
- eFPGA IP — Flexible Reconfigurable Logic Acceleration Core
- Heterogeneous eFPGA architecture with LUTs, DSPs, and BRAMs on GlobalFoundries GF12LP
- eFPGA on GlobalFoundries GF12LP
- eFPGA Hard IP Generator
- Radiation-Hardened eFPGA
Related Blogs
- Case Study: Choosing the Right Benchmarks for the Job
- Case Study: Choosing the Right Benchmarks for the Job
- A Simple Method for Choosing a Chip Design Company
- What Are Digital Twins? A Primer on Virtual Models
Latest Blogs
- Embedded Security explained: Advanced Encryption Standard (AES)
- Cadence Demonstrates PCIe 8.0 PHY at PCI-SIG DevCon 2026
- Cadence Achieves Successful Silicon Validation of 1st IP Test Chips on Intel 18A
- From Classical CAN and CAN FD to CAN XL: Functional Safety and Security for Next-Generation In-Vehicle Communication
- Accelerating Embedded Memory Performance with 16-bit xSPI PSRAM IP