Panel confronts multicore pros and cons
Richard Goering, EE Times
(03/23/2006 8:42 PM EST)
SANTA CLARA, Calif. — Panelists at the Multicore Expo here Wednesday (March 22) generally agreed that multitasking and multiprocessing have bright futures, although they identified some challenges as well. One of those challenges is the difficulty of programming next-generation multicore ICs.
Multithreading, said Michael Uhler, CTO of MIPS Technologies, provides an increase in performance without compromising power. He said the number of cores may be reduced as cores take on more capabilities, including multithreading. That's consistent with MIPS' position in February, when the company rolled out its MPS34K, a "virtual CPU" core that MIPS believes can forestall the need to move to multicore designs for some multimedia and network applications.
Heterogenous or asymmetric multiprocessing (AMP) multicore systems-on-chip (SoCs) are being built because they have lower bill of materials costs, Uhler said. "It wouldn't surprise me to see SMP [symmetric multiprocessing] on the host processor, with the system remaining AMP because of the BOM cost," he said.
(03/23/2006 8:42 PM EST)
SANTA CLARA, Calif. — Panelists at the Multicore Expo here Wednesday (March 22) generally agreed that multitasking and multiprocessing have bright futures, although they identified some challenges as well. One of those challenges is the difficulty of programming next-generation multicore ICs.
Multithreading, said Michael Uhler, CTO of MIPS Technologies, provides an increase in performance without compromising power. He said the number of cores may be reduced as cores take on more capabilities, including multithreading. That's consistent with MIPS' position in February, when the company rolled out its MPS34K, a "virtual CPU" core that MIPS believes can forestall the need to move to multicore designs for some multimedia and network applications.
Heterogenous or asymmetric multiprocessing (AMP) multicore systems-on-chip (SoCs) are being built because they have lower bill of materials costs, Uhler said. "It wouldn't surprise me to see SMP [symmetric multiprocessing] on the host processor, with the system remaining AMP because of the BOM cost," he said.
To read the full article, click here
Related Semiconductor IP
- 1.6T Ultra Ethernet Controller
- Chiplet Die-to-Die Interconnect IP Solution
- High speed MACsec Engine 100G/200G/400G/800G/1.6T
- Temperature/Voltage sensors
- AMBA Bus Host to eSPI Controller/Target
Related News
- Letter to the editor: IP pros, cons (Jonah Probell)
- NXP CoolFlux BSP's 12-bit computation has pros and cons for low-power baseband
- Taiwan confronts SoC obstacles
- Panel debates value of mixed-signal design tools
Latest News
- Imec unlocks fourfold UWB range extension using world-first narrowband receiver chip compliant with IEEE 802.15.4ab standard
- Alliance for Open Media Releases AV2 Codec, Advancing Next-Generation Open Video Coding
- VeriSilicon Drives Commercial Adoption of AV2 Across Next-Generation Video and Streaming Applications
- Cadence Announces Collaboration with Intel Foundry to Accelerate Intel 14A Process Optimization for HPC and Mobile Designs
- Menta and Presto Engineering Announce Strategic Collaboration to Accelerate Adaptive ASIC Architectures with Embedded FPGA Technology