Is Moore's Law Dead? Does It Matter?
Brian Bailey, Engineering Consultant & EETimes DesignLine contributing editor
EETimes (7/31/2013 08:00 AM EDT)
Most of the time when I hear an end-of-the-world story, I just roll my eyes and move on. However, I heard a message at DAC this year that still has me thinking.
People have been talking about the end of Moore's Law for some time, but those discussions became a lot more urgent and heated at DAC in June. Many reasons have been postulated as to why Moore's Law might end, including not being able to overcome some physical limitation -- perhaps a design issue that is preventing the whole chip from being powered up at the same time. More recently the matter of cost has been raised, where it will become so expensive to design a chip at the next node that nobody will be able to afford it. The concern has been that, with fewer design starts using the latest technologies and lower chip volumes, manufacturers would then not invest in wafer fabs for the next technology.
To read the full article, click here
Related Semiconductor IP
- TSMC 7nm 0V75 / 0V9 ESD Local Clamp – Low Cap
- TSMC 65nm 3V3 ESD Local Clamp – Rad Hard
- TSMC 5nm 1V8, 1.2V and 0.9V ESD Local Protection – Low Cap
- TSMC 3nm 3V3 ESD Local Clamp
- TSMC 3nm 1V2 ESD Local Clamp – Low Capacitance
Related News
- Moore's Law Dead by 2022, Expert Says
- Moore Microprocessor Portfolio (MMP) Inventor Files Lawsuit against TPL Group
- Moore's Law could enter the fourth dimension--via the third
- Moore's Law threatened by lithography woes
Latest News
- First Benchmarks Revealed for Jalapeño, OpenAI’s Clean-Sheet General Purpose AI Accelerator ASIC
- MIPS Leads Open Standards Development for Physical AI Platforms as RISC-V International Premier Member
- SEALSQ’s Subsidiary IC'Alps Advances QASIC Roadmap for Sovereign, Quantum-Resistant Application-Specific Integrated Circuits
- NVMe 2.4 Update Adds Post-Quantum Security, Power Controls
- Agentrys Raises $24.5 Million to Build Agentic Design Automation for Chipmakers